Globalization and Income Inequality:New Evidence and Mechanisms from China
Xinye ZHENG,Yangyang ZHANG,Ben MA,Li ZHANG
2018-01-01
Abstract:Over four decades of reform and opening up, the Chinese economy has witnessed extraordinary economic growth with rising income inequality. This phenomenon has triggered a heated academic debate on the relationship between globalization and income inequality. The current consensus is that globalization has been one of the most important drivers of economic growth in China, but diverse views remain on the impact of globalization on income inequality and the transmission mechanisms. Foreign direct investment (FDI) has been an important impetus in accelerating capital accumulation, technology upgrade and market expansion in China as globalization advances. Current research on the impact of FDI on income inequality centers on the debate and validation of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, which shows how globalization prompts changes in factor prices, leading to changes in income inequality. Other studies investigate how FDI influences local government behavior and how different behaviors by local government lead to income inequality. Few studies unite these arguments and explore more deeply the indirect channels through which FDI affects income inequality.By analyzing the behavior of local governments, our paper explores the impact of globalization on income inequality and its transmission mechanism in China. We hypothesize that in addition to the direct impact of FDI on income inequality, local governments lower labor and environmental standards to compete for more FDI. Thus, local enterprises distort or incompletely comply with labor and environmental policies issued by the central government, which leads to the rise in income inequality.We test our hypothesis empirically using a panel data set covering 31 provinces in China from 2004 to 2014. Because FDI is concentrated in urban areas, we measure income inequality as the ratio and the logarithm of the gap in per capita disposable income between the top and the lowest income quintiles in urban China. Labor standards are captured by the acceptance of labor dispute cases corresponding to per unit of industrial value-added and the fraction of identified workrelated injuries in total employment. The pollution emission per unit of industrial value-added and the emission treatment rate are used as proxies for environmental standards. Because of possible endogeneity caused by reverse causality and omitted variable problems, we use instrument variables and apply the IV-GMM estimation strategy. We find that in the context of globalization in China, FDI entry contributes positively to income inequality, with almost half of the total impact realized indirectly through the channels of labor and environmental standards. Further decomposition of the contribution by labor standards and environmental standards shows that the average contributions are 5％ and 40％, respectively. We also conduct robustness checks using different measures of labor and environmental standards, using different subsamples and introducing interaction terms, with no qualitative change in results.The new mechanism and new evidence revealed in our paper enrich the literature on globalization and income inequality. We offer new policy alternatives for the launch of new development concepts of opening, sharing and green development. These results are important for the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative and for considering policies for income redistribution. FDI has contributed greatly to China's economic growth. Despite the negative shock of globalization on income inequality, it is unwise to turn against FDI or repudiate the opening policy completely. Special attention should be paid to the behavior of local governments in conforming to labor and environmental standards. To alleviate the negative impact of FDI on the income distribution, it is important for local governments to strengthen regulations on labor and environmental standards.