Using One Hybrid 3D-1D-3d Approach for the Conceptual Design of Wccb Blanket for Cfetr
Kecheng Jiang,Xiaokang Zhang,Jia Li,Xuebin Ma,Songlin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.12.002
IF: 1.905
2017-01-01
Fusion Engineering and Design
Abstract:A hybrid 3D-1D-3D approach is proposed for the conceptual design of a blanket. Firstly, the neutron wall loading (NWL) of each blanket module is obtained through a neutronics calculation employing a 3D model, which contains the geometry outline of in-vacuum vessel components and the exact neutron source distribution. Secondly, a 1D cylindrical model with the blanket module containing a detailed radial building is adopted for the neutronics analysis, with the aim of calculating the tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and nuclear heating. Being normalized to the NWL, the nuclear heating is transferred to a 2D model for thermal-hydraulics analysis using the FLUENT code. Through a series analysis of nuclear-thermal iterations that considers the tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and thermal performance as optimization objectives, the optimized radial building of each module surrounding plasma can be obtained. Thirdly, the 3D structural design of each module is established by adding side walls, cover plates, stiffening plates, and other components based on the radial building. The 3D neutronics and thermal-hydraulics using the detailed blanket modules are re-analyzed. This approach has been successfully applied to the design of a water-cooled ceramic breeder blanket for the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR). The radial building of each blanket module surrounding plasma is optimized. The global tritium breeding ratio (TBR) calculated by the 3D neutronics analysis is 1.21, and the temperature of all materials in the 3D blanket structure is below the upper limits. As indicated by the comparison of the 1D and 3D neutronics and thermal hydraulics analyses, the front zones adjacent to plasma present larger deviatiOns of nuclear heat, namely 45% and 36.5%, in tungsten and FW, respectively. The breeder zones, which influence the overall temperature, achieve significantly smaller deviations of less than 10%. The temperature of the 2D model in the front breeder zones is consistent with the results of the 3D model, and the deviation is only 9.2%. The largest deviation 35% occurs in the back breeder zone, because the manifolds are arranged there in the 3D blanket model, and this makes the temperature of the breeder much lower. These results provide a useful reference for further optimization design. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.