Tu1190 Prevalence of Esophageal Symptoms by ROME III Criteria in Asia and Their Association with Other Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Kewin Tien Ho Siah,Kok Ann Gwee,William E. Whitehead,Minhu Chen,Xiao-hua Hou,Nitesh Pratap,Uday C. Ghoshal,Ari F. Syam,Murdani Abdullah,Myung-Gyu Choi,Young-Tae Bak,Sutep Gonlachanvit,Ching-Liang Lu,Xiaorong Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(13)62906-6
IF: 29.4
2013-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Introduction: Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry (HRM) has been increasingly used in research studies. The utility of this technique for clinical purposes requires a better understanding of the effects of variables on the recorded pressure signature. Some of these variables such as neck position and volume of swallowed material may not have appreciable effect on esophageal pressure measurements but could affect the pharynx significantly. Therefore, our AIM was to determine the effect of the bolus volume, several neck positions, and posture on the pharyngeal and Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES)pressure phenomenon using HRM technique. Methods: We studied 16 healthy young volunteers (8 F, age 20-30 years) with HRM in four neck positions (neck neutral, neck 15 extension, neck 30° and 45° flexion) and 2 body postures (sitting and supine), four volumes (dry and 5 ml, 10 ml and 20 ml). Each swallow volume was repeated three times. We measured amplitude (mmHg) duration (s) and velocity (cm/s). Results: A total of 1536 swallows were evaluated. Pharyngeal pressure phenomenon exhibited larger duration in the proximal pharynx compared to distal, while they exhibited higher amplitude in the distal pharynx compared to the proximal pharynx but not velopharyngeal region(P7-P6) (figure 1a and 1b). These parameters were not affected by posture, neck position or volume of swallowed liquid. Intrabolus hypopharyngeal pressure (IBP) increased with increased swallowed volume significantly (P,0.05). There was no effect by posture or neck position on the IBP. Resting UES pressure was not affected by the posture, however it showed significant change due to neck position P,0.05 (Table) ConclusionDuring pharyngeal HRM, neck position or posture has no appreciable effect on recorded pharyngeal peristalsis; however it affects the UES pressure significantly. This effect needs to be considered during pharyngeal HRM. Table. Effect of neck position on pharyngo-UES HRM variables
What problem does this paper attempt to address?