Correlation of deglutitive striated esophagus motor function and pharyngeal phase swallowing biomechanical events

Reza Shaker,Mark Kern,Francis Edeani,Ling Mei,Elliot Yu,Patrick Sanvanson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14920
2024-09-22
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Abstract:Premise: The isocontour depiction of pressure during swallowing is the most accepted format for evaluating swallowing and esophageal function. Interpretation of these recordings is tricky because of movement of the important structures during swallowing especially in the pharynx and striated muscle esophagus. Understanding the sequence of movement relative to the pressure data helps to more accurately interpret the isocontour. Findings: Precisely defining movement relative to the pressure measurements yields a clearer picture of four distinct phases of pressure phenomena during swallowing. Significance: Striated esophageal function spans both pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing for receiving and transporting the bolus. Pressure measurements in pressure isocontour recordings currently attributed to the esophagus does not represent the entirety of proximal esophageal function. Proximal esophageal peristalsis that occurs during its descent is recorded by pressure sensors initially in the pharynx. This finding needs to be considered when interpreting pressure isocontour recordings of the pharynx and proximal esophagus. Background The functional relationship of striated esophagus (St.Eso) motor function with pharyngeal deglutitive biomechanical events has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to determine the spatio‐temporal characteristics of St.Eso function and its correlation with pharyngeal biomechanics and bolus transport. Methods We studied 50 healthy volunteer subjects (age range: 21–82 years, 31 female) by digital videofluoroscopy. All subjects were studied in a seated, upright position. Thirteen of these 50 volunteers also underwent high‐resolution manometry (HRM) concurrent with fluoroscopy. We used laryngeal excursion as a surrogate for St.Eso excursion. Key Results Median duration of St.Eso excursion was 2.35 [1.93,2.85, 5th and 95th percentile] seconds. Mean maximum extent of St.Eso excursion was 2.84 ± 0.72 cm. We identified four distinct periods in deglutitive St.Eso motor function: P1. Anterosuperior ascent without bolus or peristaltic activity, P2. Non‐peristaltic bolus receiving at the apogee of St.Eso excursion concurrent with UES opening and pharyngeal peristalsis P3. Peristaltic bolus transport as St.Eso descends and P4. Continued peristalsis in resting position. Conclusions and Inferences 1. St.Eso motor function spans both pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing for receiving and transporting the bolus, 2. Pressure signatures in HRM recordings currently attributed to St.Eso deglutitive motor activity does not represent the entirety of St.Eso peristalsis, only the part that occurs in its resting position. St.Eso peristalsis that occurs during its descent is recorded by pressure sensors initially in the pharynx. This finding needs to be considered when interpreting HRM recordings of the pharynx and proximal esophagus.
gastroenterology & hepatology,neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?