Dysphagia associated with esophageal wall thickening in patients with nonspecific high‐resolution manometry findings: Understanding motility beyond the Chicago classification version 4.0

Jin Young Choi,Kee Wook Jung,John E. Pandolfino,Kyungmin Choi,Young Soo Park,Hee Kyong Na,Ji Yong Ahn,Jeong Hoon Lee,Do Hoon Kim,Kee Don Choi,Ho June Song,Gin Hyug Lee,Hwoon‐yong Jung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14736
2024-01-17
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Abstract:A subset of patients (2%) with normal manometry or ineffective esophageal motility and esophageal wall thickening showed distinctive repetitive pattern on manometry and poor distensibility index on FLIP. FLIP assessment or combined manometry and impedance protocols may help define these patients who may respond to per‐oral endoscopic myotomy. Background Previous studies have demonstrated that 50% of patients with normal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) findings or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) may have abnormal functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) results. However, the specific HRM findings associated with abnormal FLIP results are unknown. Herein, we investigated the relationship between nonspecific manometry findings and abnormal FLIP results. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 684 patients who underwent HRM at a tertiary care center in Seoul, Korea, based on the Chicago Classification version 4.0 protocol. Key Results Among the 684 patients, 398 had normal HRM findings or IEM. Of these 398 patients, eight showed esophageal wall thickening on endoscopic ultrasonography or computed tomography; however, no abnormalities were seen during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among these eight patients, seven showed repetitive simultaneous contractions (RSCs) in at least one of the two positions: 61% (±29%) in 10 swallows in the supine position and 51% (±30%) in five swallows in the upright position. Four patients who underwent FLIP had a significantly decreased esophagogastric junction distensibility index (1.0 ± 0.5 mm2mmHg−1 at 60 mL). Two of these patients underwent per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) due to a lack of response to medication. Esophageal muscle biopsy revealed hypertrophic muscle with marginal eosinophil infiltration. Conclusions & Inferences A subset of patients (2%) with normal HRM findings or IEM and RSCs experienced dysphagia associated with poor distensibility of the thickened esophageal wall. FLIP assessment or combined HRM and impedance protocols may help better define these patients who may respond well to POEM.
gastroenterology & hepatology,neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?