Abstract:Biomass pyrolysis is typically modeled based on the three reference components cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Most models rely on an individual decomposition of the materials and a linear superposition of the individual component products weighted by the present mass fractions. Models of varying complexity exist for the mathematical description of the pyrolysis process, ranging from the simplest single first-order (SFOR) model and the multi-step CRECK model to the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model representing the molecular network of the solid. The models differ not only in their complexity but also in the used data for initial parameter calibration — thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) data for the CRECK model and mainly entrained flow, fluidized bed, or wire mesh reactor data for the Bio-CPD model. Within the present study, the predictive performance of these three models is compared with regard to the time-dependent total volatile release and the final volatile yield when applying two different thermal boundary conditions: low heating rate in a TGA and flash pyrolysis conditions realized with a small-scale fluidized bed reactor (FBR). The models are compared with one other and with experimental data on extracted, separately pyrolyzed biomass components to examine under which conditions reliable predictions can be made and when the trustability is limited. For the TGA data, the CRECK model has the closest proximity to the experimental measurements, also resolving most of the individual reactions, while the SFOR model can resolve only one globally dominating reaction, and the Bio-CPD model strongly overpredicts the reactivity of the biomass components during the slow heat-up. Under flash pyrolysis conditions in the FBR, by contrast, the Bio-CPD model predictions are closest to the experimental results when it comes to predicting the total volatile release rate. However, examining the integrally released yields, the CRECK model is closer to the experiments. Regarding the tar and light gas distribution, all models strongly overpredict tar from primary pyrolysis compared to the experimental results, indicating the presence of secondary gas-phase reactions in the FBR. Although different secondary gas-phase reaction models are used, the tar yield is significantly overestimated by the models compared to the experimental data.

Assessment of Devolatilization Schemes in Predicting Product Yields of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis

Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis in a Rotary Drum by Coupling CFD-DEM with a One-Dimensional Thermally Thick Model

Numerical Investigation of Biomass Pyrolysis Performance in a Fluidized-Bed Reactor by a TFM-DEM Hybrid Model

Numerical Simulation and Multi-Process Coupling Analysis for Biomass Pyrolysis Fluidized Bed Reactor Based on Synergistic Effects Between Biomass and Nitrogen Inlet Modes

Computational Fluid Dynamics/Discrete Element Method Investigation on the Biomass Fast Pyrolysis: the Influences of Shrinkage Patterns and Operating Parameters

CFD-DEM Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis in Fluidized-Bed Reactor with a Multistep Kinetic Scheme

High-Resolution Particle-Scale Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis

Process simulation of flax straw pyrolysis with kinetic reaction Model: Experimental validation and exergy analysis

Comparative analysis of pyrolysis models including SFOR, CRECK, and Bio-CPD to predict reaction kinetics and products from extracted biomass components

Kinetics Study on Biomass Pyrolysis for Fuel Gas Production

Numerical Simulation on Effects of Biomass Type on Its Fast Pyrolysis in Fluidized Bed Reactor

Novel Sensitivity Study for Biomass Directional Devolatilization by Random Forest Models

Multistep Kinetic Model of Biomass Pyrolysis

A comparative thermodynamic assessment of microwave-assisted and conventional pyrolysis of biomass in poly-generation systems using coupled numerical and process simulations

Machine learning models for fast and isothermal hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: Comprehensive experiment and prediction of various product fraction yields

Biochar yield prediction using response surface methodology: effect of fixed carbon and pyrolysis operating conditions

Insight into kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis methods for lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis

A hybrid kinetic and optimization approach for biomass pyrolysis: The hybrid scheme of the isoconversional methods, DAEM, and a parallel-reaction mechanism

Kinetic Modeling of Biomass Components Pyrolysis Using a Sequential and Coupling Method

Effect of particle characteristics, kinetics and transport phenomena on the prediction of particle mass loss and products yields during biomass fast pyrolysis

Effect of Operating Parameters on Agricultural Biomass Mixture Pyrolysis Process in a Batch Reactor