Abstract:Neural mechanism underlying attention manifests itself through intertwined perceptual effects. A recent study using time-resolved behavioral measurements revealed that spatial attention mediates the processing of visual stimuli presented at precued location and uncued location in a rhythmic manner (Song et al., 2014). However, how the dynamics of spatial attention effects may interact with object/face representation is unknown. Here we combined this innovative time-resolved approach with fMRI to address this question. In each trial, an uninformative cue was presented in the left or right hemifield. Participants were asked to make speeded responses detecting whether a face or a house was presented at either the cued or uncued location. Critically, the cue-to-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) varied trial-by-trial in a small step of 20ms, from 200ms to 1080ms. Bilateral fusiform face areas (FFA) and parahippocampal place areas (PPA) were localized with separate fMRI scans. On average across SOAs, in the left FFA, right hemifield targets led to significantly increased activity than left hemifield targets for both faces and houses. By contrast, averaged activity in the right FFA was invariant to which hemifield the target was shown, but significantly modulated by which hemifield the cue was presented, suggesting effects of spatial attention for face representation in the right FFA. No such hemispheric asymmetry was found for the PPA. Moreover, both the FFA and PPA results demonstrate theta-band oscillations in the valid cue condition, complementing to results we will report in other VSS2015 abstracts that suggest similar rhythmic effects of visual attention. Together, these results show 1) hemispheric asymmetry of how spatial attention and invariant face representation may interact; 2) reliable neural correlates of the theta-band behavioral oscillation underlying attention, shedding lights on how attention mechanisms dynamically regulate the neural processing of visual stimuli. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015.

Functional Relationship Between the Left and Right Fusiform Face Areas

The Structural and Functional Correlates of the Efficiency in Fearful Face Detection.

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Functional Foveal Splitting: Evidence From Neuropsychological And Multimodal Mri Investigations In A Chinese Patient With A Splenium Lesion

Functional Lateralization of Face Processing

Functionally and Structurally Distinct Fusiform Face Area(s) in over 1000 Participants

Functional Dissociation of the Left and Right Fusiform Gyrus in Self‐face Recognition

Lateralization of face processing in the human brain.

A Study of Specific Neural Substrate for Face Processing

Neural correlates of categorical face perception

Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: an Fmri Study

Functional disconnection between the visual cortex and right fusiform face area in schizophrenia

Functional Integration Of The Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Correlates With Facial Expression Recognition

A Study on Neural Mechanism of Face Processing Based on Fmri

Distinct Response Properties Between the FFA to Faces and the PPA to Houses

Time-resolved Neural Effects of Attention Precuing and Spatial Location in the Left and Right Fusiform Face Areas.

The Neural Activation in Fusiform Face Area for Object Perception in Wide Visual Field.

The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part

FFA and OFA encode distinct types of face identity information

Dynamic interhemispheric coordination in face processing

The Differences in Neural Response to Faces and Non-Faces in the FFA: Evidence from the Central to Peripheral Visual Field