Abstract:Here, we find with parafoveal stimulation that high‐order visual fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA) are differently affected by eccentricity where PPA's modulation shows qualitative different BOLD eccentricity effects for different visual categories. Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing. The center‐periphery visual field axis guides early visual system organization with enhanced resources devoted to central vision leading to reduced peripheral performance relative to that of central vision (i.e., behavioral eccentricity effect) for many visual functions. The center‐periphery organization extends to high‐order visual cortex where, for example, the well‐studied face‐sensitive fusiform face area (FFA) shows sensitivity to central vision and the place‐sensitive parahippocampal place area (PPA) shows sensitivity to peripheral vision. As we have recently found that face perception is more sensitive to eccentricity than place perception, here we examined whether these behavioral findings reflect differences in FFA's and PPA's sensitivities to eccentricity. We assumed FFA would show higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA would, but that both regions' modulation by eccentricity would be invariant to the viewed category. We parametrically investigated (fMRI, n = 32) how FFA's and PPA's activations are modulated by eccentricity (≤8°) and category (upright/inverted faces/houses) while keeping stimulus size constant. As expected, FFA showed an overall higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA. However, both regions' activation modulations by eccentricity were dependent on the viewed category. In FFA, a reduction of activation with growing eccentricity ("BOLD eccentricity effect") was found (with different amplitudes) for all categories. In PPA however, qualitatively different BOLD eccentricity effect modulations were found (e.g., at 8° mild BOLD eccentricity effect for houses but a reverse BOLD eccentricity effect for faces and no modulation for inverted faces). Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing.

The Neural Activation in Fusiform Face Area for Object Perception in Wide Visual Field.

The Structural and Functional Correlates of the Efficiency in Fearful Face Detection.

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Distinct visual processing networks for foveal and peripheral visual fields

Preferential responses to occluded objects in the human visual cortex.

Early visual exposure primes future cross-modal specialization of the fusiform face area in tactile face processing in the blind

Perception of face parts and face configurations

Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: an Fmri Study

Task Dependence and Level of Processing in Category-Specific Regions of the Ventral Stream

Data-point-wise spatiotemporal mapping of human ventral visual areas: Use of spatial frequency/luminance-modulated chromatic faces

Spatial tuning of face part representations within face-selective areas revealed by high-field fMRI

The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part

Brain Functional Representation of Highly Occluded Object Recognition

Parafoveal vision reveals qualitative differences between fusiform face area and parahippocampal place area

Localization of FFA Using SSVEP-based Binocular Rivalry

Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition

Fluctuations of fMRI activation patterns in visual object priming

fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection

Processing of Facial Emotion in the Human Fusiform Gyrus

Neural correlates of covert orienting of visual spatial attention along vertical and horizontal dimensions