Abstract:Here, we find with parafoveal stimulation that high‐order visual fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA) are differently affected by eccentricity where PPA's modulation shows qualitative different BOLD eccentricity effects for different visual categories. Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing. The center‐periphery visual field axis guides early visual system organization with enhanced resources devoted to central vision leading to reduced peripheral performance relative to that of central vision (i.e., behavioral eccentricity effect) for many visual functions. The center‐periphery organization extends to high‐order visual cortex where, for example, the well‐studied face‐sensitive fusiform face area (FFA) shows sensitivity to central vision and the place‐sensitive parahippocampal place area (PPA) shows sensitivity to peripheral vision. As we have recently found that face perception is more sensitive to eccentricity than place perception, here we examined whether these behavioral findings reflect differences in FFA's and PPA's sensitivities to eccentricity. We assumed FFA would show higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA would, but that both regions' modulation by eccentricity would be invariant to the viewed category. We parametrically investigated (fMRI, n = 32) how FFA's and PPA's activations are modulated by eccentricity (≤8°) and category (upright/inverted faces/houses) while keeping stimulus size constant. As expected, FFA showed an overall higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA. However, both regions' activation modulations by eccentricity were dependent on the viewed category. In FFA, a reduction of activation with growing eccentricity ("BOLD eccentricity effect") was found (with different amplitudes) for all categories. In PPA however, qualitatively different BOLD eccentricity effect modulations were found (e.g., at 8° mild BOLD eccentricity effect for houses but a reverse BOLD eccentricity effect for faces and no modulation for inverted faces). Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing.

The Differences in Neural Response to Faces and Non-Faces in the FFA: Evidence from the Central to Peripheral Visual Field

The Structural and Functional Correlates of the Efficiency in Fearful Face Detection.

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Early visual exposure primes future cross-modal specialization of the fusiform face area in tactile face processing in the blind

Age-Dependent Differences in Human Brain Activity Using a Face- and Location-Matching Task: An fMRI Study

The Study on Functional Connectivity Between Frontal Eye Field and Other Brain Cortex in Visual Processing

Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: an Fmri Study

Distinct visual processing networks for foveal and peripheral visual fields

Perception of face parts and face configurations

Decreasing Integration Within Face Network and Segregation Beyond the Face Network in the Aging Brain.

Data-point-wise spatiotemporal mapping of human ventral visual areas: Use of spatial frequency/luminance-modulated chromatic faces

Altered Functional Connectivity of Fusiform Gyrus in Subjects with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Resting-State fMRI Study

The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part

Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition

A Study on Asymmetry of Spatial Visual Field by Analysis of the Fmri BOLD Response

Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults

Parafoveal vision reveals qualitative differences between fusiform face area and parahippocampal place area

Typical And Atypical Development Of Functional Connectivity In The Face Network

Functional Dissociation of the Left and Right Fusiform Gyrus in Self‐face Recognition

Task Dependence and Level of Processing in Category-Specific Regions of the Ventral Stream