Evaluation of the Counter Ions in Doped Porous Polyaniline Coatings on Stainless Steel Wires for Solid Phase Microextraction of Chlorophenolics in Water Combined with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

li liu,haixia liu,yi li,xuemei wang,xinzhen du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2014.915405
2014-01-01
Analytical Letters
Abstract:Porous polyaniline coatings doped with different counter ions were electrodeposited on the surface of stainless steel wires using controlled potentiostatic coulometry. Prior to electropolymerization, the stainless steel wires were chemically etched to improve subsequent immobilization of the polyaniline coatings on the substrate and to increase the effective surface area. Porous polyaniline coatings doped with sulfate, nitrate, and perchlorate counter ions were employed for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, triclosan, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography. The results demonstrated that the perchlorate doped polyaniline coating exhibited the highest extraction efficiency for 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and triclosan at pH 5.0, indicating that the extraction capability was modified by introducing different counter ions into the coatings. As a result, the perchlorate doped polyaniline coated fiber was further used for the optimization of extraction conditions. The method provided linear dynamic ranges over 2 to 4 orders of magnitude. The limits of detection were 0.006 mu g . L-1, 0.005 mu g . L-1, and 0.040 mu g . L-1 for 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and triclosan, respectively. The precision expressed as the relative standard deviation ranged from 2.20% to 5.04% for spiked water at 10 mu g . L-1 (n = 5) and the fiber to fiber reproducibility was between 3.27% and 5.91% (n = 5). The method was successfully applied to the determination of chlorophenolics in real water samples. The recoveries of chlorophenolics in spiked water at 5.0 mu g . L-1 were between 99.60% and 108.7% with relative standard deviations between 3.24% and 5.47%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?