Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effects of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Methods: The clinical data of 130 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, who underwent TAVR in our hospital with self-expanding valve between January 1,2010 and October 30, 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAS) group (112 cases) and non-calcific aortic valve stenosis (NCAS) group (18 cases) according to 3D volume-rendering reconstruction under multiple detector computed tomography before TAVR. The baseline clinical features, imageology results, procedural details, and clinical prognosis were compared between the 2 groups. Results: (1) Compared with CAS group, the patients in NCAS group were younger, had higher proportion of rheumatic heart disease, and less proportion of bicuspid aortic valve morphology (P<0.01 or 0.05). Except for minimum value of sinotubular junction (P=0.017), there were no significant differences in multiple detector computed tomography measurements of aortic valve annulus and aortic root structure between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). (2) Compared with CAS group, the proportions of valve release under rapid pacing and oversized valve release were larger than pre-procedural evaluation, and the proportion of post-dilation was lower in NCAS group (P<0.01 or 0.05). (3) Post-procedural transthoracic echocardiography revealed that left ventricular ejection fraction was higher than baseline level in CAS group (P<0.001), while which was similar in NCAS group (P=0.552). Compared with before TAVR, mean pressure gradient and maximum transvalvular velocity were significantly reduced, aortic valve orifice area was significantly increased, and proportion of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was significantly reduced after the procedure in both groups (all P<0.01). There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction, mean pressure gradient, maximum transvalvular velocity, aortic valve orifice area, and proportion of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). (4) There were no significant differences in successful rate of device placement and cardiovascular related death within 30 days after TAVR between the 2 groups (105/112 vs. 17/18, P=0.909; 3/112 vs. 1/18, P=0.453, respectively). Conclusion: TAVR is safe and effective for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Reduced LVEF

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with a Severe Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a Chinese Population.

Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Clinical efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis based in a single Chinese center

Clinical practice and prognosis of emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Midterm Outcome of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low to Intermediate Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Short-Term Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Predominant Aortic Regurgitation with Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Efficacy and Safety of Emergent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Acute Decompensated Aortic Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reducing Left Ventricular Wall Stress through Aortic Valve Enlargement via Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Extent of Cardiac Damage and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Meta-Analysis Comparing Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Patients With <i>Severe</i> Aortic Stenosis

An Analysis Regarding the Article: Insight Into the Optimal Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Comparison 30-Day Clinical Complications Between Transfemoral Versus Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: a Meta-Analysis Review.

Improvement of hemodynamic parameters in aortic stenosis patients with transcatheter valve replacement by using impedance cardiography

[Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis].

Echocardiographic predictors of outcome in severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Coronary protective effect of the J-Valve during transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis and low coronary artery openings