Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effects of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Methods: The clinical data of 130 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, who underwent TAVR in our hospital with self-expanding valve between January 1,2010 and October 30, 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAS) group (112 cases) and non-calcific aortic valve stenosis (NCAS) group (18 cases) according to 3D volume-rendering reconstruction under multiple detector computed tomography before TAVR. The baseline clinical features, imageology results, procedural details, and clinical prognosis were compared between the 2 groups. Results: (1) Compared with CAS group, the patients in NCAS group were younger, had higher proportion of rheumatic heart disease, and less proportion of bicuspid aortic valve morphology (P<0.01 or 0.05). Except for minimum value of sinotubular junction (P=0.017), there were no significant differences in multiple detector computed tomography measurements of aortic valve annulus and aortic root structure between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). (2) Compared with CAS group, the proportions of valve release under rapid pacing and oversized valve release were larger than pre-procedural evaluation, and the proportion of post-dilation was lower in NCAS group (P<0.01 or 0.05). (3) Post-procedural transthoracic echocardiography revealed that left ventricular ejection fraction was higher than baseline level in CAS group (P<0.001), while which was similar in NCAS group (P=0.552). Compared with before TAVR, mean pressure gradient and maximum transvalvular velocity were significantly reduced, aortic valve orifice area was significantly increased, and proportion of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was significantly reduced after the procedure in both groups (all P<0.01). There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction, mean pressure gradient, maximum transvalvular velocity, aortic valve orifice area, and proportion of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). (4) There were no significant differences in successful rate of device placement and cardiovascular related death within 30 days after TAVR between the 2 groups (105/112 vs. 17/18, P=0.909; 3/112 vs. 1/18, P=0.453, respectively). Conclusion: TAVR is safe and effective for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

[Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis].

Clinical efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis based in a single Chinese center

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with a Severe Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a Chinese Population.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Patients With <i>Severe</i> Aortic Stenosis

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Vs. Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis among Patients at Low Surgical Risk in China: from the Multicenter National NTCVR Database

30-Day Outcomes after Surgical or Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement in Symptomatic Aortic Regurgitation

Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Through Transcarotid Approach for Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Transapical aortic valve implantation using J-Valve? system for high-risk patients with aortic regurgitation: mid-stage of 1 year follow-up

Clinical practice and prognosis of emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Midterm Outcome of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low to Intermediate Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses

Short-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients with Pure Severe Aortic Regurgitation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.

Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Predominant Aortic Regurgitation with a Self-Expandable Valve

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Results from a Multicenter Registry Study

Extent of Cardiac Damage and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

[Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Renal Function in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis].

Long-term and Temporal Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Improvement of hemodynamic parameters in aortic stenosis patients with transcatheter valve replacement by using impedance cardiography

Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis