Analysis of Cases with MRI Misdiagnosed Breast Lesions

罗冉,汪登斌,王丽君,张玉珍,李芳珍,李潇潇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2014.10.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective:Joint analysis of clinical,MRI,and pathological features of missed,false-negative,and false-posi-tive lesions was performed to explore the causes of preoperative misdiagnosis.Methods:A consecutive cohort of 175 patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI with 222 pathologically confirmed lesions were retrospectively reviewed.Two breast imaging radiologists performed the MRI interpretation according to BI-RADS atlas.Comparison of MRI diagnostic performance between different lesion types was carried out.Logistic regression models were also established to differentiate benign and malignant lesions.Results:Of all 222 breast lesions (161 benign and 61 malignant),6 benign lesions were missed on MRI.Three in 4 false-negative lesions had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)component.The other 14 lesions were overes-timated.ADC value worked great for masses with AUC of 0.932,but poor for non-mass enhanced NME lesions.The sensi-tivity,specificity,and accuracy of DCE-MRI combined with DWI were 93.4%,91.3%,and 91.9%,respectively.The overall accuracy of mass and NME lesions was similar.Conclusion:Accuracy of DCE-MRI combined with DWI was high in differen-tiating benign and malignant lesions,and similar in masses and NME lesions.Underestimated lesions were mainly DCIS.Ra-diologists tended to overestimate lesions and avoided underestimation at the same time,in that the overall accuracy was al-most unaffected.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?