Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a radiomics model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in small breast cancer (≤ 20 mm in greatest dimension), and to compare the results with those of an experienced radiologist’s interpretation.Methods:A total of 205 small breast lesions in 192 consecutive female patients from June 2016 to January 2018 at Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, were retrospectively enrolled in the study. All lesions (≤ 20 mm in greatest dimension) were confirmed by surgical pathological results. The lesions were divided into a training set (116 lesions) and an independent test set (89 lesions). Based on preoperative breast DCE-MRI and DWI data, a radiomics model was built using gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT). The GBDT model was applied to the test set for differentiation between malignant and benign small breast lesions. Cases of the test set were also evaluated by an experienced radiologist for benign and malignant diseases differentiation. ROC curve was used to assess the diagnostic performance for the GBDT model and the radiologist evaluation, respectively. Differences in the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were analyzed by the DeLong test. Differences in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated by the McNemar test. Kappa values were used to assess the agreement between different evaluation methods.Results:The AUC of the GBDT model (0.950) showed no significant difference from that of the radiologist’s evaluation based on DCE-MRI combing DWI data (0.935) ( Z=0.499, P=0.618). However, it showed the AUC of GBDT model was significantly higher than that of evaluation based on DCE-MRI (0.874) or DWI (0.832) alone ( Z=2.024， P=0.043； Z=2.772， P=0.006). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the best cutoff point of GBDT model were 90.0%, 89.8% and 89.9% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of evaluation based on DCE-MRI combined with DWI were 97.5%, 79.6% and 87.6% respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between the two methods (χ 2=0.800,2.286 and 0.083, P>0.05). Conclusions:A radiomics model based on DCE-MRI and DWI images provided good diagnostic performance in small breast cancer. The results of radiomics were favorably comparable with those of experienced radiologist evaluation based on the combination of DCE-MRI and DWI data.

MR Imaging Evaluation of Small Breast Cancer

Diagnostic Evaluations of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mammary Duct Ectasia and Breast Cancer

Clinical Evaluation of MRI in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

MR Imaging Evalution of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Small Invasive Foci of Breast

Accuracy of 1.5T MRI in Determining the Resectability of Cervical Cancer

The Diagnostic Value of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Calcified Malignant Breast Lesions Showed on Mammography: Comparison with Histopathology

Evaluation of the Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mr Imaging for Patients with Bi-Rads 3-4 Microcalcifications

The value of MRI for downgrading of breast suspicious lesions detected on ultrasound

Application of MRI Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in Breast Lesions

Analysis of Cases with MRI Misdiagnosed Breast Lesions

Evaluation of Breast Cancer before Breast- conserving Surgery by Dynamic-enhanced MRI and Mammography

The Feasibility of MRI on Evaluating Breast-conserving Surgery

Performance Evaluation of Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Mammography, Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

A study on the diagnostic performance of a radiomics model based on breast MRI for small breast cancer

[Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Breast Lesions Which Need Biopsy].

The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions

Diagnostic values of magnetic resonance imaging in breast calcification

Clinical value of 3.0T MRI combined with computer aided diagnosis in breast tumors

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Lesions of Different Sizes: a Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Application of MRI in Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Masses

MRI evaluation for smal er pancreatic carcinoma with lesion size <3cm