Abstract:The cultural and public diplomacy of many countries allows for or solicits the involvement of actors that are not controlled by the state but can have a significant influence on the image-building of a society or a country. In the People’s Republic of China, on the other hand, the ruling Communist Party perceives public and cultural diplomacy as ‘external propaganda,’ a category within the vast portfolio of ‘ideology and propaganda work,’ and tends to make the participation of non-state actors conditional upon their conformity with the party-state’s metanarrative and policy. The cultural and public diplomacy of China is thus performed mostly by government agencies or actors associated with the government, including various ‘people’s organizations’ established or coopted by the party-state. The notion of culture is an essential channel of engagement of Xi Jinping’s China with foreign state institutions, non-state entities, transnational actors, and the general public, through which it seeks not only to build ‘cultural soft power,’ but also to promote broader strategic policy objectives and to solidify the regime’s domestic and international legitimacy. This collective monograph presents a conceptual introduction to cultural diplomacy and case studies of China’s use of Xinjiang in public diplomacy in Kazakhstan, ‘Silk Road’ diplomacy in Central Asia, the appropriation of the historical figure Admiral Zheng He in cultural diplomacy in Malaysia, the role of two Confucius Institutes and a university in cultural diplomacy in Malaysia, the promotion of the image of ‘Muslim’ China in cultural diplomacy in the Middle East, transnational and local actors’ impact in cultural diplomacy in Berlin, and the trajectory of China’s cultural diplomacy illustrated by the international co-production of documentary films. The publication is an outcome of the research project China’s Cultural Diplomacy: Role of Non-State Actors and Regional Variations (GAČR GA15–21829S) funded by Czech Science Foundation and running from 2015 to 2017.

Institutional Difference And Cultural Difference: A Comparative Study Of Canadian And Chinese Cultural Diplomacy

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Study on the Difference between China and the U.S.Indicator System from Cultural Background

Effects of Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Distance on Expatriates' Cross-cultural Adjustment

The Influence of Traditional Culture on Contemporary Chinese Diplomacy

Culture and institutional agency: Difference in judgments of economic behavior and organizational responsibilities

Cultural Differences between China and America in the International Negotiations under the Cultural Dimensions

Searching China's Cultural Orientation in the Contemporary Internation a Organizations

The Impact of Differences between Chinese and American Values on Sino-US Diplomatic Relations

Comparative Advantage and Institutional Arrangement

Unity in Difference: A Comparison of the Value Between China and USA

China's Cultural Diplomacy in the Age of Globalization

CHINA’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AT THE PRESENT STAGE

On the Differences Between Chinese and Western Cultures From the Perspective of Cultural Dimension Theory

The Influence of Cultural Nationality on National Diplomacy

Differences in Language Communication Between Chinese and American Cultures

The Analysis of Chinese International Students’ Culture, Language, Identity and Difference: Mediation, Adaption and Expansion

Let’s play tic-tac-toe: Confucius Institutes versus American Cultural Centres

Institutional similarity drives cultural similarity among online communities

On Cultural Diplomacy of China for Russia

Introduction: The Soft Edges of China’s Hard Power