Abstract:These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses.

Antipredator Benefits from Heterospecifics

Predator Eavesdropping in a Mixed-Species Environment: How Prey Species May Use Grouping, Confusion, and the Cocktail Party Effect to Reduce Predator Detection

Adaptive Implications Of Mixed-Species Grouping: Predators And Other Antagonists

Asymmetric information in mixed-species mobbing flocks: why are leader species special?

Odd prey in mixed species groups suffer fewer attacks than lone individuals

Asymmetrical predation intensity produces divergent antipredator behaviours in primary and secondary prey

Friends because of foes: synchronous movement within predator-prey domains

Functional Traits Determine Heterospecific Use of Risk-Related Social Information in Forest Birds of Tropical South-East Asia

Proactive cursorial and ambush predation risk avoidance in four African herbivore species

Cultural transmission, competition for prey, and the evolution of cooperative hunting

Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure.

Mesopredator suppression by an apex predator alleviates the risk of predation perceived by small prey

False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance

Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey

Behavioral types of predator and prey jointly determine prey survival: potential implications for the maintenance of within-species behavioral variation

A rodent herbivore reduces its predation risk through ecosystem engineering

Modeling vigilance in mixed‐species groups

Collective Adaptation in Multi-Agent Systems: How Predator Confusion Shapes Swarm-Like Behaviors

Additive, substitutable, and antagonistic prey responses to feral and native predator combinations

Mesopredators have differing influences on prey habitat use and diel activity in a multipredator landscape

Evolution of swarming behavior is shaped by how predators attack