Abstract:These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses.

Additive, substitutable, and antagonistic prey responses to feral and native predator combinations

Site-specific fears: Negev gerbils from same points of origin share anti-predator behavior when translocated to new environments

Antipredator behaviour and predator recognition in Belding's ground squirrels

Better to bluff than run: conservation implications of feral-cat prey selectivity

Asymmetrical predation intensity produces divergent antipredator behaviours in primary and secondary prey

Mesopredator suppression by an apex predator alleviates the risk of predation perceived by small prey

Carnivore repatriation and holarctic prey: narrowing the deficit in ecological effectiveness

Prey responses to foxes are not determined by nativeness

Prey selection by black-footed ferrets ( Mustela nigripes ): implications for intersexual resource partitioning and conservation

Active prey mixing as an explanation for polyphagy in predatory arthropods: synergistic dietary effects on egg production despite a behavioural cost

Urban fox squirrels exhibit tolerance to humans but respond to stimuli from natural predators

Eat or be eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator-savvy and predator-naive deer populations

Same place, different time, head up: Multiple antipredator responses to a recolonizing apex predator

Species-specific interactions with apex carnivores yield unique benefits and burdens for mesocarnivores

Antipredator Benefits from Heterospecifics

Association of prey quality with environmental odors in the foraging behavior of Pardosa milvina

Mesopredators have differing influences on prey habitat use and diel activity in a multipredator landscape

Mesocarnivores vary in their spatiotemporal avoidance strategies at communications hubs of an apex carnivore

Cougars, wolves, and humans drive a dynamic landscape of fear for elk

Proactive cursorial and ambush predation risk avoidance in four African herbivore species

In situ predator exposure creates some persistent anti-predator behaviours: insights from a common environment experiment