Species-specific interactions with apex carnivores yield unique benefits and burdens for mesocarnivores

Wesley Binder,Jack Rabe,Zoe Lowe,Gordon Scott,Claire Lacey,Eliza King,Daniel R. Stahler,Stotra Chakrabarti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.17.608414

2024-08-19

Abstract:Mesocarnivores must balance the negative (competition) and positive (carrion provisioning) effects of dominant apex carnivores to coexist in shared landscapes. How mesocarnivores navigate such top-down effects have typically been examined through a risk-reward lens. However, the risks accrued by mesocarnivores might not be even across all apex-mesocarnivore pairings in multi-carnivore systems, and instead can be mediated through species-specific interactions. Using remote-camera surveys from 2021-2023, we estimated apex (wolf, cougar) and mesocarnivore (red fox, coyote) spatial overlap, occupancy, temporal activity, and fine-scale behaviors in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA. Additionally, we monitored GPS-collared wolf and cougar predation from 2016-2023 and recorded red fox and coyote mortalities and scavenging events at these locations. Red foxes and coyotes were ubiquitous in our study area with high naive occupancy, despite abundant wolves and cougars. Coyote occupancy was positively associated with wolf occupancy, but exhibited marginal avoidance of cougars. Photo-detection probabilities of both mesocarnivores doubled in the 24 hours following apex carnivore detections, with the exception of coyotes following cougars. Overall latency of coyote detections was longest following cougar detections and shortest following wolves, while foxes exhibited no such difference. Further, coyotes were most active when wolves and cougars were collectively least active. Red foxes were nocturnal and appeared less sensitive to wolf and cougar activities, but avoided coyote peak times. Coyotes were more prevalent scavengers than red foxes at apex carnivore kills, but scavenging often had lethal consequences. We found that when wolves kill coyotes, it was typically when coyotes attempted to scavenge from wolf kills, while cougars killed and consumed coyotes as prey. Thus wolves act as competitors for coyotes, while cougars are both predators and competitors. This distinction possibly explains coyote avoidance of cougars but attraction to wolves. Mesocarnivores in Yellowstone leverage foraging benefits from associating with apex carnivores. However, these benefits are burdened by associating with wolves and cougars whose contrasting hunting modes and habitat preferences yield separate risks. Disparate costs to mesocarnivores contingent upon apex carnivore behavior offer novel insights into carnivore community ecology, and call for a more nuanced analysis of trophic interactions.

Ecology