Abstract:How do people monitor the correctness of their answers? A self-consistency model is proposed for the process underlying confidence judgments and their accuracy. In answering a 2-alternative question, participants are assumed to retrieve a sample of representations of the question and base their confidence on the consistency with which the chosen answer is supported across representations. Confidence is modeled by analogy to the calculation of statistical level of confidence (SLC) in testing hypotheses about a population and represents the participant's assessment of the likelihood that a new sample will yield the same choice. Assuming that participants draw representations from a commonly shared item-specific population of representations, predictions were derived regarding the function relating confidence to inter-participant consensus and intra-participant consistency for the more preferred (majority) and the less preferred (minority) choices. The predicted pattern was confirmed for several different tasks. The confidence-accuracy relationship was shown to be a by-product of the consistency-correctness relationship: It is positive because the answers that are consistently chosen are generally correct, but negative when the wrong answers tend to be favored. The overconfidence bias stems from the reliability-validity discrepancy: Confidence monitors reliability (or self-consistency), but its accuracy is evaluated in calibration studies against correctness. Simulation and empirical results suggest that response speed is a frugal cue for self-consistency, and its validity depends on the validity of self-consistency in predicting performance. Another mnemonic cue-accessibility, which is the overall amount of information that comes to mind-makes an added, independent contribution. Self-consistency and accessibility may correspond to the 2 parameters that affect SLC: sample variance and sample size.

Peer-comparison Overconfidence: Does It Measure Bias in Self-Evaluation?

On the History of Overconfidence

THE REVIEW AND PROSPECT OF OVERCONFIDENCE

Effects of Different Types of Problems and Information on Cognitive Bias in Social Comparison

The Enhancing Effect of Overconfidence on Subsequent Learning Performance: Potential Mediation Effects of Dissatisfaction and Effort

The Effect Of Overconfidence On Persistent Behavior: The Mediation Effect Of "I Think I Can Do It" Rather Than "I'M Attracted To It"

The Effects of Self-esteem on the Tendency Towards Self-verification: Evidences from Choosing Interaction Partners

The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception

The Effects of Self-Esteem on Self-Verification:Evidence from Cognitive Judgment Tasks

A Comparison of Social Cognition of Self-Confidence Between the Self and the Closest Schoolmate

Outcome Evaluation in Social Comparison: When You Deviate from Others

Overfeed the Bold, Starve the Cowardly: A Legend or Reality?

Deception and self-deception

The self-consistency model of subjective confidence.

The Effects of Overconfidence on the Index of Discrimination Ability and the Judgment Criterion in Investment Decision an Experiment Based on Signal Detection Theory

A Double-Edged-Sword Effect of Overplacement: Social Comparison Bias Predicts Gambling Motivations and Behaviors in Chinese Casino Gamblers

Confidence Charms: How Superstition Influences Overconfidence Bias in Han and the Qiang Ethnic Minority Chinese

The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study

Are self-assessment of search ability and performance reliable?

Subjective Confidence as a Monitor of the Replicability of the Response

SOCIAL COMPARISON THEORY AND THE EVALUATION OF PEER EVALUATIONS: A REVIEW AND SOME APPLIED IMPLICATIONS