Abstract: Decision making can be regarded as an outcome of mental processes (cognitive process) leading to the selection of a course of action among several alternatives. Every decision-making process produces a final choice. In this chapter, we would use the event-related brain potential (ERP) technique to study neural correlates of outcome evaluation in decision making. Firstly, we used the motivation to be deceptive as a way to manipulate the motivational state of participants. Results showed that in both groups, losing money evoked a negative component (FRN). The amplitude of FRN was higher, and the latency shorter, in the deception group than in the simple response group. In addition, monetary losses also elicited a P3 peaking at around 400 ms, which was larger in the deception group than in the simple response group. Source modeling suggested a dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) source for the FRN and a rostral ACC source for the P300. These results suggest that motivation can influence the evaluation of performance outcomes. The FRN may reflect a process signaling that the outcome is worse than what participants expect, and P300 may be related to the emotional processing of disappointment and regret. Secondly, in a simulated deception situation with graded monetary incentives, participants made a decision to lie or be truthful in each trial and held their response until a delayed imperative signal was presented. Spatiotemporal principal component analysis (PCA) and source analysis revealed that brain activities dominant in the left lateral frontal area approximately 800-1000 ms post-stimulus and over the central-frontal-parietal and right frontal areas after 1300 ms were significantly more negative in the deceptive condition than in the truthful condition. These results suggest that two serial cognitive processes, decision-making and response preparation, are related to deliberate deception. Thirdly, an ERP experiment was conducted to investigate the component processes underlying error related feedback and regret following incorrect decisions. Results showed that the amplitude of the FRN following an incorrect choice, the personal responsibility people accepted for an incorrect choice, the regret they expressed about it, and the counterfactual thinking they reported were higher when they alone made the choice than when they were not alone in their incorrect choice. No differences were found on the FRN or behavioral measures when participants were joined by one versus two others in their incorrect choice. The P300 amplitude, in contrast, was inversely related to the responsibility levels, consistent with the notion that personal accountability of a choice influences the allocation of attentional and cognitive resources to the task. Together, these results are consistent with neural modeling indicating that regret promotes error related processing and learning. Lastly, Compared with non-anxious people, anxious people are suggested to judge the negative events as more likely to happen, and more likely to interpret the ambiguous outcomes as negative ones. We predicted that the FRN should be different between high trait-anxiety (HTA) and low trait-anxiety (LTA) groups. We discovered that the amplitude of the FRN indicating negative versus positive outcomes was significantly larger for LTA participants than HTA participants. However, the intergroup difference of the FRN indicating ambiguous versus positive outcomes didn’t reach significance. The result indicated that there was a relationship between the FRN and the participants’ individual differences in anxiety, which possibly reflected the impact of anxiety on outcome expectation. This finding provided insight about the underlying features of anxiety.

Outcome Evaluation in Social Comparison: When You Deviate from Others

Brain potentials in outcome evaluation: when social comparison takes effect.

Taking Others as a Mirror: Contingent Social Comparison Promotes Task Engagement.

The Effects of Depression Tendency and Social Comparison on Adolescent Self-Evaluation.

Context-based interpersonal relationship modulates social comparison between outcomes: an event-related potential study

Interpersonal Relationships Modulate Outcome Evaluation in a Social Comparison Context: the Pain and Pleasure of Intimacy

Social Comparison Manifests in Event-related Potentials.

Consistency of Choice Modulates Outcome Evaluation:Evidence from ERP Studies

Self-other Discrepancies in Electrophysiological Response to Outcome Evaluation in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.

Social Distance Modulates Outcome Processing when Comparing Abilities with Others

Effect of social distance on outcome evaluation in self–other decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials

Neural mechanisms of social comparison in subthreshold depression

P2 Manifests Subjective Evaluation of Reward Processing Under Social Comparison

Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by the presence of an audience: An electrophysiological investigation.

The Impact of Social Comparison on the Neural Substrates of Reward Processing: an Event-Related Potential Study

Positive Outcome Evaluation is Modulated by Closeness of Outcome: an ERP Research

Outcome Evaluation in Decision Making: ERP Studies

Self-relevant Criteria Determine the Evaluation of Outcomes in the Self-performance and Other-performance Gambling Task

High- and low-social-anxiety individuals process the outcomes of ability comparisons differently: an event-related potential study

Self-reflection Modulates the Outcome Evaluation Process: Evidence from an ERP Study

Event-related Potentials Study on Outcome Evaluation Affected by Different Intensity of Expectation