Abstract:Organizations frequently rely on peer performance ratings to capture employees' unique and difficult to observe contributions at work. Though useful, peers exhibit meaningful variance in the accuracy and informational utility they offer about ratees. In this research, we develop and test theory which suggests that raters' social network positions explains this variance in systematic ways. Drawing from information processing theory, we posit that members who occupy core (peripheral) positions in the network have greater (less) access to firsthand and secondhand performance information about ratees, which is in turn associated with more (less) accurate performance ratings. To overcome difficulties in obtaining a "true" performance score in interdependent field settings, we employ an external criterion comparison method to benchmark our arguments, such that larger validity coefficients between established predictors of performance (i.e., a ratee's general mental ability [GMA] and conscientiousness) and peer performance ratings should reflect more (less) accurate ratings for core (peripheral) members. In Study 1, we use an organization-wide network in a technology startup company to examine the validity coefficient of a ratee's GMA on performance as rated by central versus peripheral members. In Study 2, we attempt to replicate and extend Study 1's conclusions in team networks using ratee conscientiousness as a benchmark indicator. Findings from both studies generally support the hypotheses that core network members provide distinct, and presumably more accurate, peer performance ratings than peripheral network members. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

SOCIAL COMPARISON THEORY AND THE EVALUATION OF PEER EVALUATIONS: A REVIEW AND SOME APPLIED IMPLICATIONS

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Peer Evaluation in Individual Innovative Intention

A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors

Validating a brief measure of four facets of social evaluation

Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation: An Expectancy Perspective

Peer-comparison Overconfidence: Does It Measure Bias in Self-Evaluation?

Peer Evaluations: Evaluating and Being Evaluated

Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

Study On Evaluation Model Of Internet Social Networking Applications Based On Humanology Research

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Peer Assessment In The Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer And Teacher Ratings

Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence

Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.

The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future

Is Peer Evaluation of Consumer Online Reviews Socially Embedded? – an Examination Combining Reviewer’s Social Network and Social Identity

A Review of Cross-Cultural Studies of Observed Peer Interaction

Informational Advantages in Social Networks: the Core-Periphery Divide in Peer Performance Ratings.

Evolution of Peer Review from the Perspective of Evaluation Theory

Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment.

Who Are Your Peers? An Empirical Investigation Of The Matched Sample Comparison Analysis