Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation: An Expectancy Perspective

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Peer Evaluation in Individual Innovative Intention

Engaging Software Engineering Students in Grading: The effects of peer assessment on self-evaluation, motivation, and study time

An Experimental Study on the Use of Peer Group’s Performance in Relative Performance Evaluation

Peer assessment of contributions and learning processes in group projects: an analysis of information technology undergraduate students’ performance

Assessing the predictive validity of expectancy theory for academic performance

Peer desirability and academic achievement

Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback

Peer Evaluations: Evaluating and Being Evaluated

Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment

Grudges and gratitude: the social-affective impacts of peer assessment

When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights from Students

An Empirical Study of the Impact of Peer Assessment on Teamwork from the Perspective of Experiential FL Teaching and Learning

A Study of Peer Assessment of English Writing in High School

A Three-Year Study on Peer Evaluation in a Software Engineering Project Course

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

The impact of peer evaluation on team effort, productivity, motivation and performance in global virtual teams

Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes

The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students' achievement goals and achievement emotions

Removing Bias and Incentivizing Precision in Peer-grading

Learning in teams: peer evaluation for fair assessment of individual contributions