Abstract:The problem of finding key players in a graph, also known as network dismantling, or network disintegration, aims to find an optimal removal sequence of nodes (edges, substructures) through a certain algorithm, ultimately causing functional indicators such as the largest connected component (GCC) or network pair connectivity in the graph to rapidly decline. As a typical NP-hard problem on graphs, recent methods based on reinforcement learning and graph representation learning have effectively solved such problems. However, existing reinforcement-learning-based key-player-identification algorithms often need to remove too many nodes in order to achieve the optimal effect when removing the remaining network until no connected edges remain. The use of a minimum number of nodes while maintaining or surpassing the performance of existing methods is a worthwhile research problem. To this end, a novel algorithm called MiniKey was proposed to tackle such challenges, which employs a specific deep Q-network architecture for reinforcement learning, a novel reward-shaping mechanism based on network functional indicators, and the graph-embedding technique GraphSage to transform network nodes into latent representations. Additionally, a technique dubbed 'virtual node technology' is integrated to grasp the overarching feature representation of the whole network. This innovative algorithm can be effectively trained on small-scale simulated graphs while also being scalable to large-scale real-world networks. Importantly, experiments from both six simulated datasets and six real-world datasets demonstrates that MiniKey can achieve optimal performance, striking a perfect balance between the effectiveness of key node identification and the minimization of the number of nodes that is utilized, which holds potential for real-world applications such as curbing misinformation spread in social networks, optimizing traffic in transportation systems, and identifying key targets in biological networks for targeted interventions.

Criminal Networks: Who is the Key Player?

Who is the Key Player? A Network Analysis of Juvenile Delinquency

Multiple Activities for Socially-Connected Criminals

Growth and containment of a hierarchical criminal network

Social Network Analysis in Multiple Social Networks Data for Criminal Group Discovery

The strength of weak ties in crime

Social Network Analysis of Crime Organization Structures

Network analysis of trait aggression among community youths and juvenile offenders

Bipartite Network Model for Inferring Hidden Ties in Crime Data

Come at the king, you best not miss: criminal network adaptation after law enforcement targeting of key players

Network Structure of the Links Between Extracurricular Time-Use and Delinquent Behaviors: Moving Forward and Beyond Linear Relations

Graph and Network Theory for the analysis of Criminal Networks

The Changing Determinants of Juvenile Crime

A Proof of Concept Study for Criminal Network Analysis with Interactive Strategies

Structural Analysis of Criminal Network and Predicting Hidden Links using Machine Learning

From Financial Misdemeanants to Recidivists: the Perspective of Social Networks

Adolescent Criminal Behavior, Population Heterogeneity, and Cumulative Disadvantage: Untangling the Relationship Between Adolescent Delinquency and Negative Outcomes in Emerging Adulthood

Leveraging Minimum Nodes for Optimum Key Player Identification in Complex Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Strategy with Structured Reward Shaping

Criminogenic Risk, Criminogenic Need, Collective Efficacy, and Juvenile Delinquency

Unlocking Criminal Hierarchies: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Exploration of Techniques for Identifying Leaders within Criminal Networks

Complex Network Tools to Understand the Behavior of Criminality in Urban Areas