Unlocking Criminal Hierarchies: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Exploration of Techniques for Identifying Leaders within Criminal Networks

Kamal Taha,Abdulhadi Shoufan,Aya Taha
2024-03-31
Abstract:This survey paper offers a thorough analysis of techniques and algorithms used in the identification of crime leaders within criminal networks. For each technique, the paper examines its effectiveness, limitations, potential for improvement, and future prospects. The main challenge faced by existing survey papers focusing on algorithms for identifying crime leaders and predicting crimes is effectively categorizing these algorithms. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a new methodological taxonomy that hierarchically classifies algorithms into more detailed categories and specific techniques. The paper includes empirical and experimental evaluations to rank the different techniques. The combination of the methodological taxonomy, empirical evaluations, and experimental comparisons allows for a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the techniques and algorithms for identifying crime leaders, assisting researchers in making informed decisions. Moreover, the paper offers valuable insights into the future prospects of techniques for identifying crime leaders, emphasizing potential advancements and opportunities for further research. Here's an overview of our empirical analysis findings and experimental insights, along with the solution we've devised: (1) PageRank and Eigenvector centrality are reliable for mapping network connections, (2) Katz Centrality can effectively identify influential criminals through indirect links, stressing their significance in criminal networks, (3) current models fail to account for the specific impacts of criminal influence levels, the importance of socio-economic context, and the dynamic nature of criminal networks and hierarchies, and (4) we propose enhancements, such as incorporating temporal dynamics and sentiment analysis to reflect the fluidity of criminal activities and relationships
Social and Information Networks,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to effectively identify leaders in criminal networks. Specifically, existing literature has deficiencies in classifying and evaluating algorithms for identifying criminal leaders, resulting in imprecise classification and inaccurate evaluation results. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a new methodological taxonomy and ranks and compares different techniques through empirical and experimental evaluations. ### Main Challenges 1. **Classification Problem**: Existing review papers often use overly broad and non - specific classification methods when classifying algorithms for identifying criminal leaders, leading to confusion of irrelevant algorithms and inaccuracy of evaluation indicators. 2. **Insufficient Evaluation**: There is a lack of systematic empirical and experimental evaluations, making it difficult to fully understand the advantages and limitations of various algorithms. ### Proposed Solutions 1. **New Methodological Taxonomy**: The paper introduces a new hierarchical taxonomy, subdividing algorithms into more specific categories and techniques, thereby achieving more precise and systematic classification. 2. **Empirical and Experimental Evaluation**: Through empirical research and experimental evaluation, different techniques are ranked and compared to provide a more in - depth understanding and evaluation. ### Specific Contributions - **Hierarchical Structure of Taxonomy**: Methodological category → Methodological sub - category → Methodological technique → Methodological sub - technique. This hierarchical structure helps to classify and evaluate algorithms more meticulously. - **Comprehensive Survey and Enhanced Evaluation**: Using the new taxonomy, a comprehensive survey of algorithms is carried out, and through empirical and experimental evaluation, the advantages and limitations of each technique are revealed. - **Future Research Directions**: Future possible research progress and opportunities are emphasized, especially in combining time - dynamics and sentiment analysis to reflect the fluidity of criminal activities and relationships. ### Key Findings 1. **PageRank and Eigenvector Centrality**: These methods are reliable in mapping network connections. 2. **Katz Centrality**: It can effectively identify influential criminals through indirect links, emphasizing their importance in criminal networks. 3. **Limitations of Existing Models**: They fail to fully consider the specific impact of criminal influence, the importance of the socioeconomic background, and the dynamic nature of criminal networks and hierarchies. 4. **Suggestions for Improvement**: It is recommended to combine time - dynamics and sentiment analysis to better reflect the changes in criminal activities and relationships and improve the ability to identify key figures. Through these methods, the paper provides strong guidance for researchers on choosing appropriate techniques and points out the direction for future improvement and development.