Self-reported Evaluation of Psychosociaal Effects of Fluorosis among Inhabitants Living in a Rural Fluorosis Epidemic Area in China: Psychosocial Effects of Dental Fluorosis

Yan Si,Huan-cai Lin,Zuo-min Wang,Bo-xue Zhang,Yu-bo Hou,Xue-jun Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7156/v2i1p026
2009-01-01
American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science
Abstract:Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychosocial effects of fluorosis on the patients in the fluorosis epidemic area. Methods: In the rural fluorosis epidemic areas in Hebei province of China, 416 inhabitants were randomly selected to be examined using Dean’s Index (DI). Surface Index of Fluorosis (TSIF) was used in 178 recruited participants who were also involved in a psychosocial questionnaire investigation. Demographic information and six five-point subscales about “Attitude to Teeth”, “Index of Well-Being”, “Index of General Affect”, “Interaction Anxiousness Scale” (IAS), “Self-Esteem Scale” (SES) and “Impact on Behavior” were included in the questionnaire. SPSS12.0 software was used to analyze the data. Result: Fluorosis prevalence in the fluorosis epidemic areas of Hebei province was 71.2%, with 1.77 of Community Fluorosis Index. Prevalence of fluorosis according to DI was lower than the results of TSIF. Difference of fluorosis prevalence calculating by DI and TSIF was evident in 35-44 years old group, and the proportion of such questionable” cases in 35-44 age group was the highest, which was 40.3%. With the increase of DI score, the average values of subscale “Attitude to Teeth” (2.58-3.51) and “Index of Well-Being” (2.35-2.90) increased. Significant difference of the evaluation on “Attitude to Teeth” could only be found between the “mild group” (DI=1/2) and the “severe group” (DI=3/4), also between the “control group” (DI=0/0.5) and the “severe group”. As for the evaluation scores on “Index of Well-Being”, there was significantly different between the “control group” and the “severe group”. According to the results of multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis, the independent variable entered the regression model was mainly the DI score, while the evaluation of other subscales were not significantly associated with the independent variables in this analysis. [N A J Med Sci. 2009;2(1):26-31.]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?