Observation of Combined Application of TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring During the Surgery of Scoliosis

陈裕光,李佛保,杨军林,万勇,彭新生,郑召民,陈立言,邹学农,夏杰华,窦云凌
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2009.01.007
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the feasibility and applied value of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) combined with cortical somatosensory evoked potential (CSEP) monitoring during the surgery of scoliosis.Methods From July 2006 to April 2008, 76 patients were simultaneously recorded the TES-MEP on bilateral anterior tibial muscle and flexor hallucal brevis and the CSEP on bilateral posterior tibial nerve during the surgery of scoliosis.Forty -night of these patients received total intravenous anesthesia and the other 27 patients were anesthetized by propofol and sevoflurane (inhalant concentration <1%).The results of TES-MEP in both groups were analyzed by X2 analysis and related index about the true positive, false positive and true negative, false negative results were calculated.Results Success rates of TES-MEP and CSEP recording were both 96.1%.There was no statistics difference of the success rate of TES-MEP in the two different anesthesia groups.Evoked potentials changes occurred in 11 cases, in which 9 cases were true positive results in direct relation to an incorrect operative maneuver.The sensitivity of the CSEP, TES -MEP and muitimodality recording was 75.0%, 87.5% and 100%, respectively.The specificity of the three methods was 98.5%, 98.5% and 97.0%, respectively.The Youden index of the three methods was 0.74, 0.86 and 0.97, respectively.Conclusion The anesthesia by intravenous propofol and sevoflurane (inhalant concentration <1%) was a feasible method for muitimodality recording.The sensitivity and precision of muitimodality recording for detecting spinal cord function were apparently higher than that of unitary TES-MEP or CSEP monitoring.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?