Abstract:Background Context Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) can improve intraoperative detection of femoral plexus and nerve root injury during lumbosacral spine surgery. However, even under ideal conditions, TcMEPs are not completely free of false-positive alerts due to the immobilizing effect of general anesthetics, especially in the proximal musculature. The application of transcutaneous stimulation to activate ventral nerve roots directly at the level of the conus medularis (bypassing the brain and spinal cord) has emerged as a method to potentially monitor the motor component of the femoral plexus and lumbosacral nerves free from the blunting effects of general anesthesia. Purpose To evaluate the reliability and efficacy of transabdominal motor evoked potentials (TaMEPs) compared to TcMEPs during lumbosacral spine procedures. Design We present the findings of a single-center 12-month retrospective experience of all lumbosacral spine surgeries utilizing multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) consisting of TcMEPs, TaMEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalography. Patient Sample Two hundred and twenty patients having one, or a combination of lumbosacral spine procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior spinal fusion (PSF), and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Outcome Measures Intraoperative neuromonitoring data was correlated to immediate post-operative neurologic examinations and chart review. Methods Baseline reliability, false positive rate, true positive rate, false negative rate, area under the curve at baseline and at alerts, and detection of pre-operative deficits of TcMEPs and TaMEPs were compared and analyzed for statistical significance. The relationship between transcutaneous stimulation voltage level and patient BMI was also examined. Results TaMEPs were significantly more reliable than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. Of the 27 false positive alerts, 24 were TcMEPs alone, and 3 were TaMEPs alone. Of the 19 true positives, none were detected by TcMEPs alone, 3 were detected by TaMEPs alone (TcMEPs were not present), and the remaining 16 true positives involved TaMEPs and TcMEPs. TaMEPs had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) at baseline than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. The percent decrease in TcMEP and TaMEP AUC during LLIF alerts was not significantly different. Both TcMEPs and TaMEPs reflected three pre-existing motor deficits. Patient BMI and TaMEP stimulation intensity were found to be moderately positively correlated. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the high reliability and predictability of TaMEPs and the potential added value when TaMEPs are incorporated into multimodality IONM during lumbosacral spine surgery.

Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Transcranial Electric Motor Evoked Potentials During Surgical Correction for Idiopathic Scoliosis under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Influence of different neuromuscular blockade levels on intraoperative spinal cord monitoring

Effect of intraoperative muscle relaxation reversal on the success rate of motor evoked potential recording in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Effects of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Without Muscle Relaxants on Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Scoliosis Surgery

Observation of Combined Application of TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring During the Surgery of Scoliosis

Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring in Scoliosis Surgery: Comparison of Desflurane/Nitrous Oxide With Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthetic Regimens

Application of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery

Safety of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (TES and EMG) for spinal and cranial lesions

Effect of the Degree of Muscle Relaxation on Motor-Evoked Potential Elicited by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Spine Surgery

Comparative Study on Two Total Intravenous Anesthesia Techniques in Complex Spine Surgery

Transabdominal Motor Evoked Potential Neuromonitoring of Lumbosacral Spine Surgery

Effects of Tetanic Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve on Intracranial Direct Electrical Stimulation Motor-Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Functional Area Operation

[Evaluation of the Role of Combined TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring During the Spinal Surgery].

Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Motor-Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Brain Tumor Removal Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label Observational Study

Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal deformity surgery

Transcranial Corticospinal Motor-Evoked Potentials in Cases of Ventral and Ventrolateral Intradural Extramedullary Cervical Spinal Cord Tumors

Electromyographic Monitoring of Facial Nerve under Different Levels of Neuromuscular Blockade During Middle Ear Microsurgery

Utility of Somatosensory- and Motor-Evoked Potential Change Thresholds in Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Stenosis Based on Different Pathologies.

Effects of different anaesthetic methods on motor evoked potentials monitoring during cervical spine surgery

The Effects of Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade Combined with Transverse Abdominal Plane Block on Surgical Space Conditions During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Study

Variability of Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Motor Evoked Potential Change Criteria in Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery Based on Preoperative Motor Status.