Abstract:Background context : Combined somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential (SSEP and MEP) changes for predicting prognosis in thoracic spinal surgery have been variably reported. Purpose : We aimed to explore the validity of combined SSEP and MEP for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in thoracic spinal decompression surgery (TSDS) and identify a relatively optimal neurophysiological predictor of PMDs in patients based on preoperative motor status. Study setting : Retrospective study. Patient sample A total of 475 patients were analyzed. Outcome Measures : A reduction in muscle strength by more than or equal to one manual muscle testing (MMT) grade postoperatively compared with the preoperative MMT grade was identified as PMDs. PMDs were detected by comparing the preoperative and postoperative physical examination findings in short- and long-term follow-up visits. Methods : All patients were divided into two subgroups according to preoperative motor status. The following data were collected: 1) demographic data; 2) IONM (intraoperative neuromonitoring) data; and 3) postoperative motor outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of IONM change to predict PMDs. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to establish optimal IONM warning criteria. Results : Ninety-eight patients had severe preoperative motor deficits (Group S), and 377 patients did not (Group N). MEP and SSEP change was effective for predicting PMDs in the short term (p <0.01) and long term (p < 0.01) for TSDS patients. In Group N, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 65.0% in SSEP amplitude and 89.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Furthermore, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were durations of change of 24.5 minutes for SSEP and 32.5 minutes for MEP. In Group S, however, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 36.5% in SSEP amplitude and 59.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Moreover, the critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of change of 16.5 minutes for SSEP and 17.5 minutes for MEP. Conclusions : The optimal IONM changes for prediction vary depending on preoperative motor status. Combined SSEP and MEP are excellent for predicting PMDs in TSDS.

Intraoperative changes in electrophysiological monitoring can be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cavernous malformation

Clinical analysis of somatosensory evoked potential as intraoperative real time monitoring method in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its significance in the judgment of prognosis

A predicted model for postoperative seizure outcomes after the surgical resection of supratentorial cavernous malformations.

Application of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in vertebral canal decompression surgery for acute spinal cord injury

Application of Intraoperative Neural Electrophysiological Monitoring During Spinal Cord Surgery:Report of 11 Cases

Application of somatosensory evoked potential and motor evoked potential in surgical resection of intramedullary spinal cord lesions

How to Make the Best Use of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring? Experience in 1162 Consecutive Spinal Deformity Surgical Procedures

Efficacy of combined monitoring with TES-MEP and CSEP during anterior or posterior surgery for cervical spondylitic myelopathy

Application of cortical somatosensory evoked potential and electromyographic monitoring in surgery for intraspinal diseases

The Impact of Neurophysiological Monitoring during Intradural Spinal Tumor Surgery

Value of SSEP(somatosensory evoked potentials) in predicting outcome of operation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal deformity surgery

Application of intraoperative nerve electrophysiological monitoring inlumbosacral spinal cord tumor resection

Variability of SSEP and MEP Change Criteria in Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery Based on Preoperative Motor Status

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors for Spinal Cavernous Malformation: a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Safety of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (TES and EMG) for spinal and cranial lesions

Prediction of outcomes for symptomatic spinal cavernous malformation surgery: a multicenter prospective clinical study

[Evaluation of the Role of Combined TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring During the Spinal Surgery].

Surgical Outcomes Of Spinal Cord Intramedullary Cavernous Malformation: A Retrospective Study Of 83 Patients In A Single Center Over A 12-Year Period

The Prognostic Value of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring by Combining Somatosensory and Motor-Evoked Potentials for Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery in Patients with Neurological Deficit (vol 46, pg 1226, 2021)

Role of combined monitoring of TES-MEP and CSEP during spinal surgery and wake-up test in evaluating the spinal cord function