Intra‐operative neuromonitoring in paediatric spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective single‐centre experience

Norine Ma,Ann Saunders,Laura Moylan,Michael B. Johnson,Monique Ryan,Eppie Yiu,Susan Liew
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19279
IF: 1.7
2024-10-25
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Intra‐operative neuromonitoring during corrective surgery for scoliosis and kyphosis provides an opportunity to prevent iatrogenic injury by detecting changes in motor or sensory function early. Our results highlight that effectiveness in detecting post‐operative deficits and provide further confidence in the use of neuromonitoring. However, there are still a high number of false positive alerts which surgeons should be aware of when making decisions. Introduction Intra‐operative neuromonitoring including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and electromyography, have replaced the Stagnara wake‐up test to allow early detection of neurological change during paediatric spinal deformity surgery. It is important for surgeons to recognize alerts triggered by loss of these potentials and act accordingly to prevent iatrogenic neurological damage intra‐operatively. This study was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of neuromonitoring alerts in paediatric spinal deformity correction surgery. Methods A retrospective single‐centre study of all patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery at a tertiary paediatric centre between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020 (inclusive) was conducted. Neuromonitoring alerts were identified through neurophysiology documentation, and these were correlated with neurological deficits documented in the patient record post‐operatively. Results A total of 399 operations were included in the study, with 147 (35.7%) of these having a motor, or motor and sensory alert triggered. Fifteen (10.2% of alerts) of these patients had a post‐operative neurological deficit, compared to seven (2.8% of no alerts) of those that had no neuromonitoring alert. The sensitivity for post‐operative neurological deficits not resolving within 3 days was 100%, and the specificity was 65.5%. Conclusion Intra‐operative neuromonitoring is highly sensitive to post‐operative neurological deficits lasting longer than 3 days. However, there is still scope for optimization of specificity, with many false positives identified.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?