Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Conception and Improvement of the Legal Regulation of Technical Investigation in China

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Discussion on the Legal Liability Investigation Mechanisms for Food Safety Government Supervision

The Improvement of China's Legislation of Secretly Investigating

On the Use of Evidence Obtained by Technical Investigation

Legal Control on Administrative Investigation

Legal Restraints on Compulsory Investigative Measures and Judicial Review

The Restatement of Investigative Interrogation in Our Country under the Background of the New Criminal Procedure Law

On the Legal Regulation of Computer Search

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Reconstruct of the System of Multi -Restraint of Investigative Power in China

Analysis of Mechanism for Establishment of Third-Party Accident Investigation

The Development of China's Electronic Case File Regulations and Its Future Implications

Analysis and Legislative Improvement on the Intellectual Property Protection by Criminal Law

Independent Mechanism of Foreign Investigation on Work Safety Accidents and Its Revelation on Chinese Investigation

On Lawyers′ Aid in Investigation in China

Inadequacy and Improvement of Legal Protection of Sensitive Personal Information

On relationship between Prosecutors and Police: How to Improve the Monitoring and Controling System on China′s Indictment-investigation

Comparative Study on Criminal Legislation of Crime of Invading Patent Rights--and on the Perfecting the Criminal Protection on Patent Rights

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China