Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Reconstruct of the System of Multi -Restraint of Investigative Power in China

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Perfecting the Separating Power System in Property Right Reform

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

Research on the Modes of Policing Reform of China in Recent Ten Years——On the Change and Reconstruction of Investigative Subject

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

On the Reconstruction of the Legal Supervision System of China's Telecomunication Monitoring Measures

Study on Judicial Review of Investigative Power

Reformation Strategies of Power Restriction and Supervision Mechanism in China

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

The People's Court in Transition: the Prospects of the Chinese Judicial Reform

Some Thoughts about the Reform of Criminal Justice System

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE MECHANISM OF INFORMATION SHARING BY CONSTRUCTING ONLINE CONNECTION BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE——a perspective of the legal supervision of procuratorial organ

The Reformation and Consummation of the Pre-trial Custody System in China

Structural restraints and institutional innovation in local governance: a case study of administrative examination and approval system reforms in Shunde, Ningbo, and Taizhou

On ＂One System＂ of Chinese Courts：the History,Practice and Theory

On Investigative Measures of Public Security Organs when Involved in a Public Security Case

Structural restraints and institutional innovation in local governance: a case study of administrative examination and approval system reforms in shunde, Ningbo, Taizhou

Policing System and State Power Construction in Contemporary China

On the Outline of Improving the Civil Procuratorial Supervision System