Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, p = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, p < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,p < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, p < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,p = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,p = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,p < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, p = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,t = −2.244,p = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,t = −3.864,p = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,t = −3.599,p = 0.001).<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.

e0558 Effects of right ventricular apical pacing on cardiopulmonary function in patients with normal heart functions

New-onset Heart Failure after Permanent Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients with Acquired High-Grade Atrioventricular Block and Normal Left Ventricular Function.

[Long-Term Effect of Different Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Ratio on Heart Structure and Function of Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemaker].

Clinical Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

The impact of chronic right ventricular apical pacing on cardiac function in patients with third degree atrioventricular block

Study of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with DDD Pacemaker Implantation During Atrioventricular Conduction and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Mode

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function

Deleterious Effect Of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing On Left Ventricular Diastolic Function And The Impact Of Pre-Existing Diastolic Disease

The effects of right ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular systolic function and cardiac remodeling

Influences of right ventricular pacing positions and proportion on ventricular events and heart function

Left atrial remodeling and reduced atrial pump function after chronic right ventricular apical pacing in patients with preserved ejection fraction

Effects of Right Ventricular Pacing on Intra-Left Ventricular Mechanical Activation in Patients

Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Normal Ejection Fraction.

Effects of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing on Ventricular Contraction Synchrony and Cardiac Function

Effects of right atrial and ventricular DDD pacing on cardiac function and ventricular contraction synchrony

[Risk Factors for Heart Failure after Right Ventricular Apical Pacing].

Effects of Septal Pacing of Right Ventricular Apex and Right Outflow Tract on Cardiac Function and Synchronization with Left Ventricular Contraction

Long-term effects of different pacing sites of right ventricle on left ventricular mechanical synchrony and systolic function

THE SPECIFIC VALUE OF UPGRADING TO LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH PACING IN PATIENTS WITH PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY OR NON-PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Role of echocardiography parameters in evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in elderly patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction implanted with dual-chamber pacemaker