Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The qualitative and quantitative features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in biomarker expression of breast cancer

The value of combined scoring of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in the differential diagnosis of TI-RADS 4 nodules

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

A Diagnostic Model for Breast Lesions with Enlarged Enhancement Extent on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Improves Malignancy Prediction

Utility of Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Identification Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography on Peripheral Pulmonary Cancer

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in BI-RADSUS 4B Breast Lesions

Correlation Analysis between Expression Profiles of Molecular Markers and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Breast Cancer

Meta‐analysis of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast adenosis and breast cancer

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Synchronized with Shear Wave Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: a Diagnostic Test

The Culture of Pediococcus pentosaceus T1 Inhibits  Listeria Proliferation in Salmon Fillets and Controls Maturation of Kimchi.

Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?

Qualitative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Combination of conventional ultrasound with quantitative and qualitative analyses of CEUS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast solid lesions: A modified breast cancer model

Combined Use of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner and the US Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Lesions of the Breast

Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Lesions: a Preliminary Study