Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Quantitative Parameters of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: the Correlation with Pathological Prognostic Factors.

The qualitative and quantitative features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in biomarker expression of breast cancer

Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography

Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of benign and malignant breast tumors

Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification: Value in Malignancy Prediction for Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Lesions

Evaluation of Breast Lesions by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

Correlation Analysis between Expression Profiles of Molecular Markers and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Breast Cancer

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Breast Lesions of Different Sizes: a Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Significance and Feasibility of the Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System

Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Microflow Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Masses in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Value of Ultrasound Elastography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Micro-Flow Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Breast Lesions A Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Value of an Expanded Range of Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Hypervascular Breast Masses.

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Breast Lesions: Combined Utility of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Enhancement Patterns and Quantitative Analysis in Breast Lesions: Comparison with Contrast-enhanced MRI