Abstract:Developing students' critical thinking skills in writing is essential in different educational contexts. However, the analysis of the argument structure in non-English-major undergraduate students' writing remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to analyze the structure of argumentative English papers written by Chinese university students, based on the adapted Toulmin model of argument structure constituting six elements (claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data). The participants in this study were a class of 47 sophomores enrolled in the course "Modern Education Technology" at Zhejiang University, China. They were required to identify the components of the argument structure in a pre-assigned short text with two opposing views, and to write an argumentative essay. Content analysis was used to assess the students' CT and argument structures. In both tasks, the results found that the majority of the students could identify author's claim with at least a piece of data. They also stated their own claims and provided at least one piece of data to back these up. However, a majority failed to identify the author's counter argument and even though many stated the counter argument claims in their essays, most were unjustified. The majority did not state a conclusion in both tasks. This study may be beneficial in understanding non-English major-undergraduate students' critical thinking skills in English writing and the results suggest that L2 essay writing instructors should use active and explicit methods such as computer-assisted argument mapping tools like RationaleTM to help learners master the argument structure. Some pedagogic guidelines are listed for the implementation of the RationaleTM software in the L2 classroom.

Evaluating the Impact of Collectivism and Individualism on Argumentative Writing by Chinese and North American College Students

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Individualism, Collectivism, and Chinese Adolescents' Aggression: Intracultural Variations

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Chinese and American Thinking Patterns from Perspective of Collectivism and Individualism

The Analysis of Argument-Counterargument Structure in Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing

Processes Involved in Chinese and English Writing: A Study of Chinese University Students

Discerning cultural shifts in China? Commentary on Hamamura et al. (2021).

How Does Collectivism Affect Social Interactions? A Test of Two Competing Accounts

Exploring Linguistic Features, Ideologies, and Critical Thinking in Chinese News Comments

Comparing the Effects of Argumentation and Facework on Americans and Chinese' Responses to Advice in Supportive Interactions

Differences of Address Forms in Chinese and English Annotated from Individualism and Collectivism

Small-Group Student Talk Before Individual Writing in Tertiary English Writing Classrooms in China: Nature and Insights

Unity in Difference: A Comparison of the Value Between China and USA

Chinese as a Foreign Language ( CFL ) Learners ’ Representation of Voice in Argumentative Writing

Investigation and Analysis of Teaching Writing in English in China

Collaborative cheating among chinese college students: the effects of peer influence and Individualism-Collectivism orientations

Understanding critical thinking in Chinese sociocultural contexts: A case study in a Chinese college

Relationships among individualism--collectivism, gender, and ingroup/outgroup status, and responses to conflict: a study in China and the United States

Examining Cultural and Gender Similarities and Differences in College Students’ Value of Communication Skills in Romantic Relationships

Speech·Discourse·Rhetoric·Effectiveness:An Analysis of Rhetoric Tendencies in English Speeches Written by Chinese University Students