Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of the study is to investigate what values are now important to young American and Chinese managers, since they profile the direction in which their country is headed. It aims to explore if the ethical values of young executives in different countries are converging to a common global business culture. It also aims to argue that the individualism-collectivism value dimension by itself does not capture the differences between the Chinese and American sample members. The vertical-horizontal dimension, in contrast, seems to better delineate the value orientations among young executives in the two countries. Design/methodology/approach - In this two-phase study, both attitudinal and scenario-based measurements are applied to assess the strength of work value orientations among similar subjects in China and the USA. Findings - In study 1, Chinese respondents score significantly higher on a hierarchical-vertical dimension than do the Americans, although the two groups do not differ significantly on the collectivism-individualism dimension. In study 2, which entails resolving an ethical dilemma, the American subjects apply Egalitarianism as their most frequent expressed value, reflecting their horizontal perspective. The Chinese subjects, in contrast, rely strongly on a traditional vertical value system to resolve the ethical dilemma. Although both American and Chinese negotiators show a collectivist as well as an individualist. orientation, their focuses are fundamentally different. Originality/value - The well-established collectivism/individualism cultural dimension has been heavily used in cross-cultural studies, sometimes without much discretion. This study was undertaken as a preliminary attempt to outline the cultural patterns observed among young managers in America and China. The paper argues that cross-cultural differences underlying ethical conflicts should not be reduced to the single value dimension of individualism/collectivism.

Differences of Address Forms in Chinese and English Annotated from Individualism and Collectivism

Culture Influence on Address in China and English-speaking Countries

Chinese and American Thinking Patterns from Perspective of Collectivism and Individualism

A Quantitative Study of Face Negotiation Behaviors in Intercultural Conflicting Context

Contrast between Russian and Chinese Address Forms in Cultural perspective

A Comparative Study of Kinship Address Forms between Chinese and English from an Intercultural Communication Perspective

Research of Differences in Chinese and Western Thinking in Linguistic and Custom

Language Differences between Chinese and Western Cultures

Individualism, Collectivism, and Chinese Adolescents' Aggression: Intracultural Variations

Comparative Study of Cultural Value Orientation between China and America

Balancing Yin & Yang:Chinese Values Orientations and Their Structures

Evaluating the Impact of Collectivism and Individualism on Argumentative Writing by Chinese and North American College Students

Values and lifestyles of individualists and collectivists: a study on Chinese, Japanese, British and US consumers

Individualism and collectivism in Chinese and American television advertising

A Comparative Study of Cultural Differences Between English and Chinese—A Case Study of Chinese and English Greetings

A Study of Some Cultural Differences between China and English-Speaking Countries

Modeling and analysis of Chinese culture and communication

The Values Orientations of International Cultural-Studies Scholars

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

A Contrast on the Differences of Politeness Principle in Chinese-English Cross-Cultural Communication

Culture Value, Consumer Perceived Value and Purchase Decision Style: Comparison of Chinese Urban Differences