Abstract:Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is the main chemical–physical parameter to be determined for pure surfactants for their characterization in terms of surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The CMC values can be calculated from different techniques (e.g., tensiometry, conductivity, fluorescence spectroscopy), able to follow the variation of a physical property with surfactant concentrations. Different mathematical approaches have been applied for the determination of CMC values from the raw experimental data. Most of them are independent of the operator, despite not all of the fitting procedures employed so far can be applied in all techniques. In this experimental work, the second derivative of the experimental data has been proposed as a unique approach to determine the CMC values from different techniques (tensiometry, conductimetry, densimetry, spectrofluorimetry, and high-resolution ultrasound spectroscopy). To this end, the CMC values of five different surfactants, specifically three anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycolate, and N-lauroyl sarcosinate) and two nonionic, such as polyethylene glycol ester surfactants [polyethylenglicol (8) monostearate and polyethylenglicol (8) monolaurate], have been determined by this approach. The "second-derivate" approach provides a reliable determination of the CMC values among all of the techniques investigated, which were comparable to those calculated by the other operator-free routinely methods employed, such as segmental linear regression or Boltzmann regression. This study also highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of each technique over the others, providing an overview of the CMC values of commonly used anionic and nonionic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field, determined by employing different experimental approaches.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420</a>.ESI mass spectra of all surfactants; DSC traces for all surfactants; conductivity vs concentration plot for the anionic surfactants; sound speed vs concentration plot for the PEG8-L surfactant; CMC values calculated by the segmental linear regression method for all surfactants according to the different techniques used and the CMC values calculated by the Boltzmann nonlinear fitting of fluorescence raw data; and fluorescence intensity (peak I/III) vs concentration plots for all surfactants (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420/suppl_file/la0c00420_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Determination of Shape Transition Concentrations in Self-Assembled Surfactant Micelles by Uv-Visible Spectrophotometry

Detection of the critical micelle concentration of cationic and anionic surfactants based on aggregation-induced emission property of hexaphenylsilole derivatives

Determination of micelle aggregation numbers of alkyltrimethylammonium bromide and sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactants using time-resolved fluorescence quenching

A study of vitamin A as a probe in critical micelle concentration determinations of surfactants

Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration: One Approach Fits All?

Critical micelle concentration determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate by fluorescence spectrometry without fluorescent probe

Determination of Critical Micellar Aggregation Numbers of Quaternary Ammonium Gemini Surfactants Containing Modified Rosin by Steady-State Fluorescence Probe Method

Study of the Interfacial Array Behaviour of Surfactant at Very Low Concentration by Second Harmonic Generation and Molecular Dynamic Simulation

The study of micellar transitions in mixed systems of dibranched cationic/nonionic fluorinated surfactants using various physicochemical methods

Quantifying the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic and Ionic Surfactants by Self-Consistent Field Theory

Determination of critical micelle concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate in butyl acrylate emulsions

Comparative Studies On The Crystalline To Fluid Phase Transitions Of Two Equimolar Cationic/Anionic Surfactant Mixtures Containing Dodecylsulfonate And Dodecylsulfate

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of SDS in Formamide by Capillary Electrophoresis

Influence factors on the critical micelle concentration determination using pyrene as a probe and a simple method of preparing samples

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of Surfactants Using Environmentally Sensitive Carbonized Polymer Dots

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate in Distilled Water at 298.15K by Surface Tension Measurements

Aggregation Behavior of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Mixtures in Aqueous/Chitosan Solution at Various Temperatures: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach

Evaluation of micellar properties of sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate in the presence of some salts

Critical Micellar Concentrations of Quaternary Ammonium Surfactants with Hydroxyethyl Substituents on Headgroups Determined by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of Surfactants by Contact Angle Measurement Method

Flow-injection chemiluminescence method for determination of critical micelle concentration of surfactants