Abstract:Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is the main chemical–physical parameter to be determined for pure surfactants for their characterization in terms of surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The CMC values can be calculated from different techniques (e.g., tensiometry, conductivity, fluorescence spectroscopy), able to follow the variation of a physical property with surfactant concentrations. Different mathematical approaches have been applied for the determination of CMC values from the raw experimental data. Most of them are independent of the operator, despite not all of the fitting procedures employed so far can be applied in all techniques. In this experimental work, the second derivative of the experimental data has been proposed as a unique approach to determine the CMC values from different techniques (tensiometry, conductimetry, densimetry, spectrofluorimetry, and high-resolution ultrasound spectroscopy). To this end, the CMC values of five different surfactants, specifically three anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycolate, and N-lauroyl sarcosinate) and two nonionic, such as polyethylene glycol ester surfactants [polyethylenglicol (8) monostearate and polyethylenglicol (8) monolaurate], have been determined by this approach. The "second-derivate" approach provides a reliable determination of the CMC values among all of the techniques investigated, which were comparable to those calculated by the other operator-free routinely methods employed, such as segmental linear regression or Boltzmann regression. This study also highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of each technique over the others, providing an overview of the CMC values of commonly used anionic and nonionic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field, determined by employing different experimental approaches.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420</a>.ESI mass spectra of all surfactants; DSC traces for all surfactants; conductivity vs concentration plot for the anionic surfactants; sound speed vs concentration plot for the PEG8-L surfactant; CMC values calculated by the segmental linear regression method for all surfactants according to the different techniques used and the CMC values calculated by the Boltzmann nonlinear fitting of fluorescence raw data; and fluorescence intensity (peak I/III) vs concentration plots for all surfactants (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420/suppl_file/la0c00420_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of Surfactants Using Environmentally Sensitive Carbonized Polymer Dots

Carbon Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes in the Measurement of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Surfactants

Detection of the critical micelle concentration of cationic and anionic surfactants based on aggregation-induced emission property of hexaphenylsilole derivatives

Influence factors on the critical micelle concentration determination using pyrene as a probe and a simple method of preparing samples

Determining the Critical Micelle Concentrations of Cationic Surfactants Based on the Visible-Light-induced Oxidase-Like Activity of Fluorescein

Determination of surfactant critical micelle concentration by a novel fluorescence depolarization technique.

Rapid determination of surfactant critical micelle concentration in aqueous solutions using fiber-optic refractive index sensing

Dual emissive amphiphilic carbon dots as ratiometric fluorescent probes for the determination of critical micelle concentration of surfactants

Determination of Surfactant cmc Based on the Fiber Refractive Index Sensor Principle

Near-Infrared Hydrophobic Probes As Molecular Light Switch for CMC Determination of Triton X-100 Solution

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentrations of Surfactants by Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy

Fabrication of Polydiacetylene Liposome Chemosensor with Enhanced Fluorescent Self-Amplification and Its Application for Selective Detection of Cationic Surfactants.

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of Surfactants by Contact Angle Measurement Method

Accurate and Sensitive Probing of Onset of Micellization Based on Absolute Aggregation‐caused Quenching Effect

Critical micelle concentration determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate by fluorescence spectrometry without fluorescent probe

Determination of Critical Micellar Aggregation Numbers of Quaternary Ammonium Gemini Surfactants Containing Modified Rosin by Steady-State Fluorescence Probe Method

Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration: One Approach Fits All?

Determination of the critical premicelle concentration, first critical micelle concentration and second critical micelle concentration of surfactants by resonance Rayleigh scattering method without any probe.

Fluorescence probe studies on the second critical micelle concentration of several kinds of surfactants

ESTIMATION OF THE CRITICAL MICELLE CONCENTRATION OF NONIONIC SURFCTANTS BASED ON THE FLUORESCENCE MUTATION OF A NEAR-INFRARED HYDROPHOBIC CYANINE DYE

Determination of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Surfactant in Aqueous Solution by Twisted Intramolecular Charge Transfer Probe DMABN