Strong Metal–Support Interaction: Growth of Individual Carbon Nanofibers from Amorphous Carbon Interacting with an Electron Beam

Wei Zhang,Luise Theil Kuhn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201300452
IF: 4.5
2013-01-01
ChemCatChem
Abstract:Great interest has been stimulated in probing the growth behavior and mechanisms of carbon nanofibers (CNFs), as CNFs are known to have electronic, mechanical, chemical, and optical properties that can be exploited for new applications. In principle, high-temperature, decomposition of carbon-containing gases over catalytic metals (for instance, Co, Fe, and Ni), or coupling of these two factors, is indispensible for growth of CNFs. The synthesis methods of CNFs include arcdischarge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition. To grow CNFs from a solid carbon source, the provided energy is usually utilized to enhance the activity of the metal catalysts involved. Amorphous carbon, dispersed with catalytic nickel particles in several tens of nanometers, can be transformed to CNFs while interacting with an electron beam. For a solid carbon system, however, it is still an open question to establish if nickel catalysts smaller than tens of nanometers can trigger the formation of CNFs, when exposed to an electron irradiation without external heating. Moreover, approaching a limit, what will occur when the catalyst particles are exchanged with atomic-scale nickel? To answer this question, a confined space must be established to effectively confining a mixture of solid carbon and catalyst nanoparticles. The porosity of a porous ceramic is an ideal platform for studies of this irradiation effect. Herein we report that CNFs grew from amorphous carbon, which was physically mixed with metastable nanoparticles of fluorite-type Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 and 10 wt. % Ni ions (CGO/Ni), in the porous anode of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), stimulated by an electron beam in a 300 kV transmission electron microscope (TEM). The underlying mechanism is ascribed to the irradiation induced instability of the nanoparticles. The strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) effect is activated between the exposed nickel ions and amorphous carbon. Thus the rearrangement of carbon atoms occurring in the mixtures leads to the growth of CNFs without any gaseous carbon source and external heating. The result provides new insight into understanding the growth behavior of CNFs. The sample is a porous anode of an SOFC: the backbone is a composite of Zr0.84Y0.16O1.92 and Sr0.94Ti0.9Nb0.1O3 (STN/YSZ) infiltrated with CGO/Ni electro-catalytic nanoparticles (see the Experimental Section). As illustrated by “Nano@pore” in Figure 1 a, the CGO/Ni nanoparticles are well distributed in the pore sites around large STN/YSZ grains in the anode. As the pore sites were already impregnated with epoxy, the nanoparticles are physically mixed with amorphous carbon (cured epoxy) at nanoscale. The infiltrated nanophases assemble with amorphous carbon forming continuous composites of carbonCGO/Ni around STN/YSZ. As shown in the inset of Figure 1 a, illustrated by the continuous electron diffraction rings, the four main crystal planes of a fluorite structure (CaF2 type) similar to the CGO phase, (111), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) and (3 11) were identified for the CGO/Ni nanoparticles. Considering that CGO/Ni keeps the fluorite structure of CGO phase (space group Fm3̄m, a = b = c = 5.43 , a= b=g= 908), Ni has been well incorporated into the CGO lattice (although a minority of Ni ions may stay on the surface of CGO nanoparticles). This can occur if, a) Ni + substitutes Ce /Gd + in the fluorite structure or b) Ni + is at the interstitial sites in the fluorite structure. Incorporation of Ni can be possible considering the large difference of ionic radius between Ni + (0.69 ) and Ce/Gd (0.97/ 0.938 ). 16] In fact, it has previously been reported for CGO that the fluorite structure can be preserved even when the atomic ratio of Gd/(Ce+Gd) increases from 20 % (Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9) to 30 % (Ce0.7Gd0.3O1.85) with intermediation of more oxygen vacancies, 18] indicating the possibility of incorporating heterogeneous ions into the CGO phase. With the occurrence of the substitution, besides CGO, the fluorite-type Ce(Ni)O2 [19] was observed to also form. However, it is not possible to distinguish these two phases using selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) analysis or high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) imaging in that they not only keep the identical fluorite structure but also maintain the similar lattice parameters. So far, we can’t distinguish whether we observe case a) or b) or a mixture of them. The HRTEM image (Figure 1 b) shows the CGO/Ni nanoFigure 1. a) TEM image of the anode of the SOFC. The inset in (a) is the corresponding SAED analysis of the nanoparticle region. b) HRTEM image of the nanoparticle region.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?