Abstract:Academic abstract: Advantaged group allies have multiple motives for supporting equality, raising questions about their sincerity. We draw upon the covariation model of attributions to explain how disadvantaged group members make attributions about whether advantaged group "allies" are sincerely motivated to empower the disadvantaged group. We propose an Attribution-Identity Model of Sincerity (AIMS) which posits that disadvantaged group members view advantaged group members as sincere allies when they support equality in the presence of inhibitory causes and in the absence of facilitative causes, exceed expectations for the advantaged group, and provide support across time and contexts. Furthermore, those who identify strongly with their disadvantaged group and perceive intergroup inequality as illegitimate are most motivated to ascertain the sincerity of advantaged group members' allyship. AIMS suggests how members of disadvantaged groups seek to maximize benefits and minimize risks of advantaged group members' allyship. Public abstract: Advantaged group members (e.g., men, White Americans) can act as allies for disadvantaged groups (e.g., women, Americans belonging to minoritized racial groups), but members of disadvantaged groups sometimes have reason to question whether their motives are sincere. We argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when they support equality when they do not stand to benefit from it and even when they stand to lose. We also argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when their support for equality goes beyond expectations for their advantaged group, consistently over time, and is not limited to particular situations, forms, or contexts. Members of disadvantaged groups like sincere allies, want to work with them, and feel safe around them. Sincere allies also serve as moral exemplars to other members of advantaged groups.

Similarity As Threat: A Motivational Explanation of Self-Other Similarity Judgment Asymmetry

Further Support for the Motivational Explanation of Self-Other Similarity Judgment Asymmetry

Temporal Distance,Automatic Activation of Self-discrepancy and Value Orientation

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

The mnemonic mover: nostalgia regulates avoidance and approach motivation.

Threats to personal control fuel similarity attraction

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

[Uniqueness seeking behavior as a self-verification: an alternative approach to the study of uniqueness]

Taking Others as a Mirror: Contingent Social Comparison Promotes Task Engagement.

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Cognitive complexity explains processing asymmetry in judgments of similarity versus difference

Serial Multiple Mediation of Anxiety and Hostile Attribution Bias in the Relationship Between Need for Uniqueness and Adolescents' Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Two-Wave Study

Representational similarity analysis of self‐ versus other‐processing: Effect of trait aggressiveness

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Is subjective perceptual similarity metacognitive?

Motivational and emotional aspects of the self

Competitive Exclusion Versus Mimetic Isomorphism: an Identified Empirical Test

Self–other moral bias: Evidence from implicit measures and the Word-Embedding Association Test

The contribution of sensory information asymmetry and bias of attribution to egocentric tendencies in effort comparison tasks

The effect of approach and avoidance motivation on self-perception

Motivational intensity and valence are married, but they are not the same person: Commentary on Campbell et al. (2021).