Abstract:The relationship between sample loading amount and peptide identification is crucial for the optimization of proteomics experiments, but few studies have addressed this matter. Herein, we present a systematic study using a replicate run strategy to probe the inherent influence of both peptide physicochemical properties and matrix effects on the relationship between peptide identification and sample loading amounts, as well as its applications in protein quantification. Ten replicate runs for a series of laddered loading amounts (ranging between 0.01 approximately 10 microg) of total digested proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were performed with nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled with linear ion trap/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (nanoLC-LTQ-FT) to obtain a nearly saturated peptide identification. This permitted us to differentiate the linear correlativity of peptide identification by the commonly used peptide quantitative index, the area of constructed ion chromatograms (XIC) (SA, from MS and tandem MS data) in the given experiments. The absolute loading amount of a given complex sample affected the final qualitative identification result; thus, optimization of the sample loading amount before every proteomics study was essential. Peptide physicochemical properties had little effect on the linear correlativity between SA-based peptide quantification and loading amount. The matrix effects, rather than the static physicochemical properties of individual peptides, affect peptide measurability. We also quantified the target protein by selecting peptides with good parallel linear correlativity based upon SA as signature peptides and revised the data by multiplying by the reciprocal of the slope coefficient. We found that this optimized the linear protein abundance relativity at every amount range and thus extended the linear dynamic range of label-free quantification. This empirical rule for linear peptide selection (ERLPS) can be adopted to correct comparison results in proteolytic peptide-based quantitative proteomics, such as accurate mass tag (AMT) and targeted quantitative proteomics, as well as in tag-labeled comparative proteomics.

β‐Actin as a loading control: Less than 2 μg of total protein should be loaded

Identifying new sperm Western blot loading controls

Western Blotting Using In-Gel Protein Labeling as a Normalization Control: Advantages of Stain-Free Technology

Misleading Westerns: Common Quantification Mistakes in Western Blot Densitometry and Proposed Corrective Measures

A superior loading control for the cellular thermal shift assay

Actin, a reliable marker of internal control?

Relationship Between Sample Loading Amount and Peptide Identification and Its Effects on Quantitative Proteomics

A critical path to producing high quality, reproducible data from quantitative western blot experiments

Evaluating Strategies to Normalise Biological Replicates of Western Blot Data

Improving rigor and reproducibility in western blot experiments with the blotRig analysis

Western Blotting a review: Principle, protocol and problem solving

Methodological considerations for improving Western blot analysis

Checking transfer efficiency and equal loading via qualitative optical way in western blotting

Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user

Validating Antibodies for Quantitative Western Blot Measurements with Microwestern Array

The Design of a Quantitative Western Blot Experiment

Effects of different current densities on efficiency of electrotransfer for the large-molecular-weight protein in Western blot assay

Alternative Method for Quantifying Protein Expression in Western Blotting Analysis

Significant impact of consumable material and buffer composition for low-cell number proteomic sample preparation