Abstract:Densitometry data generated for Western blots are commonly used to compare protein abundance between samples. In the last decade, it has become apparent that assumptions underpinning these comparisons are often violated in studies reporting Western blot data in the literature. These violations can lead to erroneous interpretations of data and may contribute to poor reproducibility of research. We assessed the reliability of Western blot data obtained to study human myometrial tissue proteins. We ran dilution series of protein lysates to explore the linearity of densitometry data. Proteins analysed included α SMA, HSP27, ERK1/2, and GAPDH. While ideal densitometry data are directly proportional to protein abundance, our data confirm that densitometry data often deviate from this ideal, in which case they can fit nonproportional linear or hyperbolic mathematical models and can reach saturation. Nonlinear densitometry data were observed when Western blots were detected using infrared fluorescence or chemiluminescence, and under different SDS-PAGE conditions. We confirm that ghosting artefacts associated with overabundance of proteins of interest in Western blots can skew findings. We also confirm that when data to be normalised are not directly proportional to protein abundance, it is a mistake to use the normalisation technique of dividing densitometry data from the protein-of-interest with densitometry data from loading control protein(s), as this can cause the normalised data to be unusable for making comparisons. Using spiked proteins in a way that allowed us to control the total protein amount per lane, while only changing the amount of spiked proteins, we confirm that nonlinearity and saturation of densitometry data, and errors introduced from normalisation processes, can occur in routine assays that compare equal amounts of lysate. These findings apply to all Western blot studies, and we highlight quality control checks that should be performed to make Western blot data more quantitative.

Alternative Method for Quantifying Protein Expression in Western Blotting Analysis

An AIE‐based Enzyme‐activatable Fluorescence Indicator for Western Blot Assay: Quantitative Expression of Proteins with Reproducible Stable Signal and Wide Linear Range

WaveletQuant, an Improved Quantification Software Based on Wavelet Signal Threshold De-Noising for Labeled Quantitative Proteomic Analysis

The Design of a Quantitative Western Blot Experiment

Checking transfer efficiency and equal loading via qualitative optical way in western blotting

Application of In-cell Western and Cell ELISA for Relative Quantification of Large Molecular Weight Protein

A Ponceau Staining based Dot-Blot Assay for reliable and cost-effective Protein Quantification

Improved semiquantitative Western blot technique with increased quantification range

A critical path to producing high quality, reproducible data from quantitative western blot experiments

Microwave-Enhanced Ink Staining for Fast and Sensitive Protein Quantification in Proteomic Studies

A Ponceau S Staining-Based Dot Blot Assay for Rapid Protein Quantification of Biological Samples

[New Protein Assay with Improved Tolerability to Interferences].

New developments in Western blot technology

Protein quantification and visualization via ultraviolet-dependent labeling with 2,2,2-trichloroethanol

Methodological considerations for improving Western blot analysis

Quantitative proteomics: assessing the spectrum of in-gel protein detection methods

Dot-Blotting: A Quick Method for Expression Analysis of Recombinant Proteins

Misleading Westerns: Common Quantification Mistakes in Western Blot Densitometry and Proposed Corrective Measures

Comprehensive Optimization of Western Blotting.

Sensitive Western-Blot Analysis of Azide-Tagged Protein Post Translational Modifications Using Thermoresponsive Polymer Self-Assembly