Abstract:Densitometry data generated for Western blots are commonly used to compare protein abundance between samples. In the last decade, it has become apparent that assumptions underpinning these comparisons are often violated in studies reporting Western blot data in the literature. These violations can lead to erroneous interpretations of data and may contribute to poor reproducibility of research. We assessed the reliability of Western blot data obtained to study human myometrial tissue proteins. We ran dilution series of protein lysates to explore the linearity of densitometry data. Proteins analysed included α SMA, HSP27, ERK1/2, and GAPDH. While ideal densitometry data are directly proportional to protein abundance, our data confirm that densitometry data often deviate from this ideal, in which case they can fit nonproportional linear or hyperbolic mathematical models and can reach saturation. Nonlinear densitometry data were observed when Western blots were detected using infrared fluorescence or chemiluminescence, and under different SDS-PAGE conditions. We confirm that ghosting artefacts associated with overabundance of proteins of interest in Western blots can skew findings. We also confirm that when data to be normalised are not directly proportional to protein abundance, it is a mistake to use the normalisation technique of dividing densitometry data from the protein-of-interest with densitometry data from loading control protein(s), as this can cause the normalised data to be unusable for making comparisons. Using spiked proteins in a way that allowed us to control the total protein amount per lane, while only changing the amount of spiked proteins, we confirm that nonlinearity and saturation of densitometry data, and errors introduced from normalisation processes, can occur in routine assays that compare equal amounts of lysate. These findings apply to all Western blot studies, and we highlight quality control checks that should be performed to make Western blot data more quantitative.

The Design of a Quantitative Western Blot Experiment

The Design of a Quantitative Western Blot Experiment

A critical path to producing high quality, reproducible data from quantitative western blot experiments

Improved semiquantitative Western blot technique with increased quantification range

Western Blotting a review: Principle, protocol and problem solving

New developments in Western blot technology

WaveletQuant, an Improved Quantification Software Based on Wavelet Signal Threshold De-Noising for Labeled Quantitative Proteomic Analysis

Improving rigor and reproducibility in western blot experiments with the blotRig analysis

Methodological considerations for improving Western blot analysis

Protein purification and analysis: next generation Western blotting techniques

Validating Antibodies for Quantitative Western Blot Measurements with Microwestern Array

Misleading Westerns: Common Quantification Mistakes in Western Blot Densitometry and Proposed Corrective Measures

Western blotting: evolution of an old analytical method to a new quantitative tool for biomarker measurements

Western blot: Technique, theory, and trouble shooting

Alternative Method for Quantifying Protein Expression in Western Blotting Analysis

Comprehensive Optimization of Western Blotting.

Western Blotting Inaccuracies with Unverified Antibodies: Need for a Western Blotting Minimal Reporting Standard (WBMRS)

Evaluating Strategies to Normalise Biological Replicates of Western Blot Data

The development of microfluidic-based western blotting: Technical advances and future perspectives

Titration-WB: A methodology for accurate quantitative protein determination overcoming reproducibility errors