Abstract:Purpose: To compare the short-term efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 86 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscope-assisted radical surgery of sigmoid cancer or upper rectal cancer from January 2015 to September 2017 (T1-3 stages in preoperative imaging evaluation, no distant metastasis, and body mass index <28 kg/m2) were selected and randomly divided into the NOSE group (no abdominal incision, n=43) and conventional laparoscopy group (LA group, n=43). The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative diet time, postoperative hospitalization duration, postoperative pain score and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. The pathological conditions of surgical specimens were recorded. The postoperative recurrence rate of tumor and survival rate of patients were also recorded and compared. Results: The general clinical features were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths. The operation time in NOSE group was slightly longer than that in LA group, without statistically significant difference (p=0.130). In NOSE group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly smaller than in LA group [(59.31±14.64) mL vs. (75.41±18.16) mL, p<0.001], the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly lower than that in LA group [(4.2±1.6) points vs. (5.9±1.4) points, p<0.001], and the postoperative exhaust time and regular diet time were significantly shorter than those in LA group [(2.1±1.0) d vs. (2.6±1.2) d, p=0.039, (3.8±1.1) d vs. (4.4±1.4) d, p=0.030]. The cosmetic result in NOSE group was better than that in LA group [(8.0±1.5) vs. (6.4±1.1), p<0.001]. Moreover, the comparison results of surgical specimens showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the intestine resection length, proximal and distal resection margins, tumor size, number of lymph nodes dissected and TNM stage of tumor between the two groups (p>0.05). The postoperative tumor recurrence rate had no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.359), and the Log-rank test revealed that the disease-free survival (DFS) rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.280). Conclusions: NOSE without abdominal incision has a comparable short-term clinical efficacy to conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid cancer and upper rectal cancer, but it significantly reduces the amount of intraoperative bleeding and lowers the pain of patients, with rapid postoperative recovery and high safety, so it is worthy of clinical popularization.

Two Different Endoscopic Long Intestinal Tube Placements for Small Bowel Obstruction: Transnasal Ultrathin Endoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy

A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Comparison of the effect between traditional conservation and nasointestinal tube placement in adhesive small bowel obstruction: A matched case-control study

Evaluation of Endotracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Lateral Patient Positioning: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Intestinal Obstruction Treated by Inserting Intestinal Obstruction Tube Via Gestrosecopy

Endotracheal Intubation under Video Laryngoscopic Guidance During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgery in the Left Lateral Position

Use of short single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a single-center experience

Prospective Evaluation of Intestinal Decompression in Treatment of Acute Bowel Obstruction from Crohn's Disease.

[Efficacy and Safety of Digestive Tract Stent Placement under Direct Visual Endoscopy Without X-ray Monitoring in Treatment of Digestive Tract Stricture].

Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction

Comparison of safety between double lumen-tube and endobronchial occluder for single-lung ventilation

Improved Method of Gastrostomy Tube Replacement Using a Small-Caliber Transnasal Endoscope

Long Intestinal Tube Splinting Really Prevents Recurrence of Postoperative Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Study of 1,071 Cases

Observation on the curative effect of long intestinal tube in the treatment of phytobezoar intestinal obstruction

Comparison between metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for malignant large-bowel obstruction

Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer

Utility of Abbreviated Small Bowel Follow Through Study in the Management of Small Bowel Obstruction

Clinical application of short-type single balloon enteroscope to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis

[Comparison of early operative treatment and 48-hour conservative treatment in small bowel obstruction (COTACSO): intermediate results]

Transnasal Esophagogastroduodenoscopy for Placement of Nasoenteric Feeding Tubes in Patients with Severe Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases.

Short-term outcomes of deeper intubation technique of ileus tube for different types of acute intestinal obstruction patients: A retrospective multicenter study