Abstract:Aim: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation. Methods: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study. The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstruction-induced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) (n = 54) or conventional surgery (n = 54; control group). Short-term (operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative urinary retention, postoperative perianal edema, and postoperative pain) and long-term (postoperative anal stenosis, postoperative sensory anal incontinence, postoperative recurrence, and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups. The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined. Results: In terms of short-term clinical effects, operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group (24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min, 2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d, both P < 0.01). The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (48.15% vs 37.04%). The incidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group (11.11% vs 42.60%, P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery, first defecation, and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group (2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1, 2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7, respectively, all P < 0.01). With regard to long-term clinical effects, the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group, but the difference was not significant (1.85% vs 5.56%). The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group (3.70% vs 12.96%, P < 0.05). The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group, but the differences were not significant (11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%, respectively). Conclusion: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.

Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction

A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Long Intestinal Tube Splinting Really Prevents Recurrence of Postoperative Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Study of 1,071 Cases

Long Term Follow-Up and Risk Factors Analysis of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

Short-term outcome of intracorporeal ileocolonic anastomosis in patients with visceral obesity

Abdominal Cocoon with Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction A Case Report and Review of Literature in China

[Comparison of early operative treatment and 48-hour conservative treatment in small bowel obstruction (COTACSO): intermediate results]

Two Different Endoscopic Long Intestinal Tube Placements for Small Bowel Obstruction: Transnasal Ultrathin Endoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy

Long-term Follow-Up Following Nonsurgery for Early Postoperative Inflammatory Intestinal Obstruction

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Association of Abdominal Incision Length With Gastrointestinal Function Recovery Post-operatively: A Multicenter Registry System-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparison of the effect between traditional conservation and nasointestinal tube placement in adhesive small bowel obstruction: A matched case-control study

[Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Chronic Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction].

Risk Factors for Small Bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multivariate Analysis in Four Expert Centres in Europe

Short-term outcomes of deeper intubation technique of ileus tube for different types of acute intestinal obstruction patients: A retrospective multicenter study

A review of early small bowel obstructions in staged IPAA procedures

Clinical characteristics and laparoscopic application evaluation of internal abdominal hernia without abdominal operation history

Prospective Evaluation of Intestinal Decompression in Treatment of Acute Bowel Obstruction from Crohn's Disease.

Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids vs traditional surgery for outlet obstructive constipation

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

Short-term Outcomes Following Purse-String Versus Conventional Closure of Ileostomy Wounds in Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients — a Single Center Retrospective Study