Bird Sounds and the Framing of The Canterbury Tales

J. Halbrooks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/EMS.2017.0000
2019-02-05
Abstract:The poem suggests a boundary between animal and human experience that is permeable only in one direction. While we humans make animal-like noises, animals do not have access to language and all of the obligations and anxieties that go with it. This essay will suggest that Chaucer, too, is interested in this human/animal boundary as defined by sound, though, at least in his world of narrative, it is permeable in both directions.2 I will further posit that this permeable boundary frames the entire narrative of the Canterbury sequence and that it opens up questions regarding the nature of language, culture, and the relationship between humans and their environments. This framing happens in a very specific way, as the sequence opens with birdsong and closes with the curtailing of birdsong in The Manciple’s Tale, as the fictional space of the sequence opens and then closes. We think of Chaucer as a supremely visual poet, from the parade of vivid portraits of his pilgrims in The General Prologue to the tableaux of The Knight’s Tale, to the dazzling sequences of images in the dream visions. V. A. Kolve and many others have long since charted all of this imagery, considered it in historical context, and described its widely varied iconographical and typological significances. Sound in Chaucer has received considerably less attention, and animal
Philosophy,History
What problem does this paper attempt to address?