Literary, Legal, and Last Judgments in The Canterbury Tales
Elizabeth A. Dobbs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/SAC.1992.0001
2018-01-03
Abstract:TWARD THE END of Th, Gmm,I Pmlogu, to Th, Cantabury Tales, Chaucer's narrator recounts an exchange between "oure Hooste" (line 751) and his guests, during which the Host proposes a structure for the journey to Canterbury. 1 The general terms of his proposal are well known: each pilgrim will tell two tales going to Canterbury and two returning to Southwark, and the teller of the best tales will win a supper. The pilgrims "by oon assent" (line 817) agree to the proposal. But what have they agreed to? What sort of arrangement has been made? The pilgrims themselves provide one description. When the Knight finds-by the luck of the draw the morning after the Host's proposal-that he must tell the first tale, he cheerfully accepts with "'Syn I shal bigynne the game"' (line 853 ). The Host also uses the word "game" when he comments following The Knight's Tale that "'trewely the game is wel bigonne"' (MilP 3117). But the Host's language in setting out his proposal, as well as the narrator's in describing the pilgrims' response to it, points repeatedly to arrangements more precise than those denoted by "game," arrrangements, in fact, connected with the law. The legal nature of the proposal has been noted by Joseph Allen Hornsby in his Chaucer and the Law, in which he argues that the Host's proposal is a contract specifically for debt. 2 While I agree with much of Hornsby's argument, I think that both language and situation at the end of The General Prologue refer rather to several contrac tual or quasi-contractual arrangements and, more importantly, to parts of legal procedure. I specifically argue that the proposal and the reaction to it allude to the legal actions of covenant and debt, that the movement from General Prologue to the first tale plays on the action of account, and that
Law,History