Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) suspicious targeted biopsy in the biopsy of prostate cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 181 patients with suspected prostate cancer underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy from September 2011 to September 2013 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.In all the 181 patients had the transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy,116 patients with suspicious MRI had two additional targeted biopsies.Prostate cancers were detected in 97 of 181 patients,and the prostatic hyperplasia were detected in 84 patients.The detection rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,suspicious MRI targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in prostate cancer were tested by χ2 test.Compared with pathological results,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy were calculated and tested by χ2 test.Results Prostate cancer was detected in 97 of 181 patients(53.6%),63(34.8%) was detected by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,and 81(44.8%) was detected by suspicious MRI targeted biopsy.The suspicious MRI targeted biopsy detected more prostate cancers which there had statistical differences compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy(χ2=34.830,P=0.015).Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate systematic biopsy missed 34 cases of prostate cancer,and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy missed 16 cases,accounting for 35.1%(34/97) and 16.5%(16/97) of prostate cancer.The 181 patients were biopsied a total of 1 896 cores,including transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy 1 448 cores and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy 448 cores.The sensitivity,specifi city,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of suspicious MRI targeted biopsy was 89.8%(280/312),87.4%(1 384/1 584),58.3%(280/480),97.7%(1 384/1 416) compared with the sensitivity of 71.8%(224/312),specifi city of 22.7%(360/1 584),positive predictive value of 15.5%(224/1 448) and negative predictive value of 80.4%(360/448) in transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy(χ2=14.008,96.037,143.049,170.729,all P < 0.001).Conclusions The detection rate of prostate cancer of suspicious MRI targeted biopsy is higher than transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,but can′t replace transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy.The two methods are complementary to improve the prostate cancer detection rate.

Targeted Biopsy with MRI and Ultrasound Improves Detection of High Risk Prostate Cancer

The value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and additional targeted cores from suspicious magnetic resonance imaging in the biopsy of prostate cancer

Real-time precision targeted prostate biopsy using transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance fusion

Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Outperforms Standard Approaches in Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

MRI–Ultrasound Fused Approach for Prostate Biopsy—How It Is Performed

MRI increases detection of prostate cancers and reduces overdiagnosis, finds study.

Accuracy of MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided and systematic biopsy of the prostate

A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer

[Diagnostic Accuracy of Transperineal MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy at the Introduction Period]

MRI/US imaging fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy:a research in single center

Targeted Prostate Biopsy: How, When, and Why? A Systematic Review

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer

Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

MRI and Targeted Biopsy Essential Tools for an Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment Decision Making in Prostate Cancer

Cognitive magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted biopsy combined with randomized biopsy in detection of prostate cancer

Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI‐Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI‐RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate

Robotic-assisted magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion results in higher significant cancer detection compared to cognitive prostate targeting in biopsy naive men

Mri Scans Could Help One in Four Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Avoid Biopsy

"Super-active surveillance": MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy and ablation for less invasive management of prostate cancer

Application value of multi-parameter magnetic resonance image-transrectal ultrasound cognitive fusion in prostate biopsy

Value of cognitive fusion targeted and standard systematic transrectal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis