Abstract:Abstract Objectives Prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with subsequent targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions has a critical role in the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of systematic biopsies, targeted biopsies, and the combination of both in prostate cancer detection. Methods From January 1, 2013 to June 1, 2022, biopsy-naïve and prior biopsy-negative patients who underwent both systematic and targeted biopsies were included. MRIs were evaluated according to PI-RADS with biopsy threshold set at PI-RADS ≥3. Systematic biopsies consisted of 8-12 cores, based on prostate volume. Overall prostate cancer and clinically significant cancer (Gleason Score ≥3 + 4) detection rates were stratified based on PI-RADS and location within the prostate, and compared between biopsy types using McNemar test. Results Among 867 patients, 615 had prostate cancer, with 434 clinically significant cases. Overall detection rates were: PI-RADS 3 48%, PI-RADS 4 72%, and PI-RADS 5 90%. Detection rates for clinically significant cancer were 21%, 53%, and 72%, respectively. The combination of biopsy methods was most accurate in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .001). Targeted biopsies alone detected more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsies alone (43.1% vs 40.3%, P = .046). For posterior PI-RADS 5 lesions, no statistically significant difference was found between all biopsy methods. Conclusions In the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, the combination of systematic and targeted biopsies proves most effective. Targeted biopsies rarely missed significant cancer for posterior PI-RADS 5 lesions, suggesting systematic biopsies could be reserved for instances where targeted biopsy results are negative. Advances in knowledge This study emphasizes on the efficacy of mpMRI and targeted biopsies in suspected prostate cancer in real-world clinical context. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, systematic biopsies provide limited clinical benefit and may only be necessary when targeted biopsy results are negative.

[Lipoid nephrosis: changes in proteinemia and albuminemia after resolution of proteinuria].

Targeted Prostate Biopsy: How, When, and Why? A Systematic Review

Biopsy strategies in the era of mpMRI: a comprehensive review

Advanced Imaging for Localized Prostate Cancer

A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Unanswered Questions

[Advances in artificial intelligence-assisted MRI radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer]

Ecological physiology of Pereskia guamacho, a cactus with leaves.

A contemporary review: mpMRI in prostate cancer screening and diagnosis

Real-time precision targeted prostate biopsy using transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance fusion

Systemic absorption of metronidazole.

Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Direct MRI-guided In-Bore Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Step-by-Step How To and Lessons Learned

Beyond transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: available techniques and approaches

Accuracy of MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided and systematic biopsy of the prostate

Emerging and anticipated innovations in prostate cancer MRI and their impact on patient care

Advancements in MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

MRI-derived radiomics models for diagnosis, aggressiveness, and prognosis evaluation in prostate cancer

Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review

Artificial Intelligence–assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Sequential assembly of the nucleotide excision repair factors in vivo.