Can we better estimate resting oxygen consumption by incorporating arterial blood gases and spirometric determinations?

Adriano R Tonelli,Xiao-Feng Wang,Anara Abbay,Qi Zhang,José Ramos,Kevin McCarthy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03555
2015-01-01
Respiratory Care
Abstract:BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that oxygen consumption (<(V)over dot>. O-2) estimation in patients with respiratory symptoms is inaccurate and can be improved by considering arterial blood gases or spirometric variables. METHODS: For this retrospective study, we included consecutive subjects who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Resting <(V) over dot>. O-2 was determined using breath-bybreath testing methodology. Using a training cohort (n = 336), we developed 3 models to predict <(V) over dot>. O-2. In a validation group (n = 114), we compared our models with 7 available formulae. RESULTS: Our first model (<(V) over dot>. O-2 = -184.99 + 189.64 x body surface area [BSA, m(2)] + 1.49 x heart rate [beats/min] + 51.51 x F-IO2 [21% = 0; 30% = 1] + 30.62 x gender [male = 1; female = 0]) showed an R-2 of 0.5. Our second model (<(V) over dot>. O-2 = -208.06 + 188.67 x BSA = 1.38 x heart rate + 35.6 x gender + 2.06 x breathing frequency [breaths/min]) showed an R-2 of 0.49. The best R-2 (0.68) was obtained with our last model, which included minute ventilation (<(V) over dot>. O-2 = -142.92 + 0.52 x heart rate + 126.84 x BSA + 14.68 x minute ventilation [L]). In the validation cohort, these 3 models performed better than other available equations, but had wide limits of agreement, particularly in older individuals with shorter stature, higher heart rate, and lower maximum voluntary ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: We developed more accurate formulae to predict resting <(V) over dot>. O-2 in subjects with respiratory symptoms; however, equations had wide limits of agreement, particularly in certain groups of subjects. Arterial blood gases and spirometric variables did not significantly improve the predictive equations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?